MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6967403178 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10376340

Orcevia wuliang Yu & Maddison & Zhang 2023, sp. nov.

2023· article· en· W6967403178 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypeParatypeDorsumSolar prominenceTrunk

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Orcevia wuliang Yu & Zhang, sp. nov. (ĿDzĸ尔¤) Figs 8, 13, 294–314 Type material. Holotype: ♂ (MHBU-ARA-00023550), CHINA: Yunnan Province, Dali City, Nanjian County, Mt. Wuliang, Cherry Blossom Valley, 24.7599°N, 100.5182°E, 1898 m elev., 27 July 2021, leg. K. Yu & W. Wang, HBUARA#2021-314. Paratype: 1♀ (MHBU-ARA-00023551), same data as holotype (All type materials were raised and matured in October~ November 2021). Etymology. The specific epithet is from the type locality; noun in apposition. Diagnosis. Males can be distinguished from O. sica (Wu & Yang, 2008) comb. nov. by the relatively curved and wide RTA (Fig. 304); females can be distinguished from O. sica by the copulatory openings that are far away from each other (Fig. 305), and the accessory glands that are visible in dorsal view of vulva (Fig. 306). Description. Male (holotype). Habitus as shown in Fig. 300. Carapace length 2.45; abdomen length 2.23; measurements of eyes: AME 0.40, ALE 0.25, PME 0.06, PLE 0.21; measurements of legs: I 4.34 (1.30, 0.99, 0.95, 0.81, 0.50), II 3.78 (1.16, 0.78, 0.70, 0.67, 0.47), III 3.89 (1.20, 0.63, 0.73, 0.82, 0.51), IV 4.38 (1.33, 0.70, 0.93, 0.89, 0.53); leg formula 4132. Body dark, dorsally covered by irregular karki setae; femora I–III almost all dark, femora IV with melanic area on distal half, other segments dark distally. Palp (Figs 302–304): bulb swollen; embolus rather slender, protruding edge of embolic disc divided into two parts (Figs 307, 310); RTA wide basally, gradually narrowed to tip, tip of RTA blunt, slightly curved forwards. Female. Habitus of paratype as shown in Fig. 301. Carapace length 2.66; abdomen length 2.99; measurements of eyes: AME 0.46, ALE 0.29, PME 0.06, PLE 0.22; measurements of legs: I 4.15 (1.28, 0.95, 0.85, 0.61, 0.46), II 3.86 (1.26, 0.82, 0.74, 0.60, 0.44), III 4.30 (1.39, 0.71, 0.83, 0.84, 0.53), IV 4.87 (1.49, 0.79, 1.09, 0.96, 0.54); leg formula 4132. Body dark, carapace with sparse yellow setal band on posterior half of axis; boundary of melanic areas on legs indistinct. Epigynum and vulva (Figs 305–306): copulatory openings small, far from each other, outer edge extending downwards, forming wide U-shaped groove above genital furrow; copulatory ducts thick, wider than 2/3 of diameter of spermathecae; accessory glands visible in ventral view, slightly curved basally. Natural history. Specimens were collected from cracks on large rock. Distribution. China (Yunnan).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies→French-language works237,207→