The effect of raw material supply and production costs on the profit of manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aimed to examine the effect of raw material inventory and production costs on company net profit. The dependent variable is the net profit of manufacturing companies, while the independent variables are raw material inventory and production costs consisting of raw material costs, direct labor costs, and factory overhead costs. The population of this study was manufacturing companies in the consumer industry sub-sector that were listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) during the period 2018–2020. Sampling was based on purposive sampling using the criteria of consumer industry companies listed on IDX during 2018–2020, which used the rupiah as the currency in their financial reports, and had complete financial report data. Multiple linear regression was employed as the data analysis technique. The results show that raw material inventory had no effect on company profits, raw material costs had a significant positive effect on company profits, direct labor costs had a significant positive effect on company profits, and factory overhead costs had no significant effect on company profits. The coefficient of determination (R2) shows that 14.4% of company profits in the consumer industry sub-sector for the period 2018–2020 can be explained by raw material inventories, raw material costs, direct labor costs, and factory overhead costs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".