Seeversiella globicollis AB, BC, MB, NB, NF, NS, ON, QC, SK
Bibliographic record
Abstract
124. Seeversiella globicollis (Bernhauer) (Illustrations in Klimaszewski et al. 2018), Table 1 References. Bernhauer 1907. Ashe 1986. Gusarov 2003. Klimaszewski et al. 2007b, 2011, 2015 a, 2018, 2020. Majka and Klimaszewski 2008b. Webster et al. 2016. Distribution. Nearctic. Canada: AB, BC, MB, NB, NF, NS, ON, QC, SK. USA: AZ, CO, ID, MA (NSR), MI, MN, MT, NH, NM, SD, WI. Collection and Habitat data. The NH specimens were captured in birch/beech leaf litter, leaf litter by stream, hemlock/fir leaf litter, frass and litter in Betula and Acer tree holes; and in conifer logs and rotten wood. Adults collected from April to October. In Canada found in old-growth coniferous and deciduous riparian and montane forests, and a meadow. Specimens were also taken from moose dung, soil and moss under logs, leaf litter near a body of water, river debris, humus under maple, Populus litter at the edge of spruce-cedar forest, a pine stump buttress, and litter near the sea (Webster et al. 2016, Klimaszewski et al. 2018). Material. USA, Massachusetts, Barnstable Co.: Falmouth, Frances Crane WMA, 41.61064, -70.2507, 3.IV.2016, M.F. DiGirolomo, ex. funnel trap, SPB Lure, 1 female (MFDC). New Hampshire, Carroll Co.: 1 mi N Wonalancet, E Fork Spring Brk., 1900’, 15.V.1985, sift conifer logs, 2 males; 21.VI.1985, D.S. Chandler, sift birch / beech leaf litter, 1 male. 2 mi NW Wonalancet, 19.VII.1984, D.S. Chandler, sift leaf litter by stream, 1 female. The Bowl, 2.5 mi NW Wonalancet, 3.X.1984, D.S. Chandler, sift hemlock litter, 1 female; 22.V.1985, sift hemlock / fir leaf litter, 1 male; sift birch / beech leaf litter, 1 male. Coos Co.: 3 mi E Stewartstown, 23.V.1982, D.S. Chandler, sift birch litter, 1 male. Mt. Washington Auto Road, 2700’, 7.VII.1982, sift birch litter (3M, 2 females); 18.VI.1982, D.S. Chandler, sift leaf litter along stream, 1 male, 1 sex? Grafton Co.: Hubbard Brook Exp. For., Bear Brook, 1500’, 24.IX.1982, 15.X.1982, sift birch / beech leaf litter, D.S. Chandler, 2 males, 4 females, 1 sex?; sift rotten wood, 1 male, 1 female; 2200’, 24.IX.1982, R.M. Reeves, sift leaf litter, 1 female; 1500’, 24.IX.1982, R.M. Reeves, sift leaf litter, 2 females. East Pond Brook, Livermore, 2600’, 10–30.VI.1983, Burger & Pistrang, drift net sample, 1 female. 5 km W Bartlett, Sawyer Pond Trail, 1800’, 11.IX.1987, A. Davies, sifting frass and litter in Betula, Acer tree holes (CNC), 1 male, 2 sex?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.043 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".