Trousse d'activités ludiques favorisant le savoir-être des stagiaires
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Trousse destinée aux superviseurs de stage qui souhaitent accorder une place importante au savoir-être dans le contexte de la supervision. La trousse comprend sept activités ludiques, les scénarios pédagogiques et le matériel nécessaire à la mise en œuvre des activités dans le cadre des supervisions collectives de stages. Des fiches explicatives présentent les modèles et les principes pédagogiques sous-jacents aux activités de la trousse. Un carnet de réflexion comprend des questions supplémentaires qui favorisent la réflexion du stagiaire.
Stored with the screening record, where it is evidence for the labels above.
How this classification was reachedexpand
The three-model screen
all 5,600 screened works →All three models called this out of scope.
Toolkit of playful activities for internship supervisors to develop trainees' professional soft skills; a teaching resource for practicum supervision, not about the research workforce or research practice.
The record is an educational activity toolkit for internship supervisors, not a study of research.
Pedagogical activity kit for internship soft skills supervision; education practice resource, not research about research.
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.030 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".