MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6967465700 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10953122

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS FOR CONSUMER BEHAVIOR PREDICTION

2024· article· en· W6967465700 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Canadian institutionsBell (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSentiment analysisLexiconConsumer confidence indexVariety (cybernetics)Transparency (behavior)Product (mathematics)Consumer behaviourAnalyticsFocus (optics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sentiment analysis has proven to be an indispensable tool in consumer behavior analysis, and it is utilized for predicting people's actions and choice based on the given sentiments. This article investigates a blend of sentiment analysis technique with conventional consumer behavior analytic approaches that expands prognostic ability. Commencing with a general introduction which covers the basic concepts of sentiment analysis such as what it is, how it is done, and where it is applied, the paper brings to the limelight how the study of what customers feel is crucial during this digital era. Sentiment Analysis is a type of text analytics which is being employed to make sense of data from website, social media, product reviews, feedback surveys, and many more companies have started to use the tool to improve on their consumer targeting strategies. The paper deliberates on a wide variety of sentiment analysis approaches, ranging from lexicon based techniques to advanced machine learning and deep learning models, whereby these applications are highlighted as being useful in the extendibility of sentiments and emotions. Sentiment analysis is also examined, with a focus on analyzing trends across different industries including retail, hospitality, finance, and healthcare. The paper looks into the effect of sentiment analysis on business performance over a period of time and how this leads to market outcomes. As well, the paper tackles ethical concerns with sentiment mining, including privacy worries and discrimination, stressing out transparency and responsible data usage through consumer data. Consumers’ sentiment and behavior are getting filtered with sentiment analysis and it provides the businesses the measurable data and actionable insights which in turn improves the decision-making abilities, personalized marketing approach, and customer satisfaction and loyalty. This article aims at covering the area of consumer behavior analysis which emphasizes the place of emotional analysis in consumer sentiment deciphering and ensuing individual choice prediction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicSentiment Analysis and Opinion MiningFrench-language works237,207