Microporella setiformis O'Donoghue & O'Donoghue 1923
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Microporella setiformis O’Donoghue & O’Donoghue, 1923 Fig. 9, Table 2 Microporella setiformis O’Donoghue & O’Donoghue, 1923: 174, pl. 3 fig. 21. Microporella setiformis – Osburn 1952: 385, pl. 44 fig. 8. — Soule et al. 1995: 150, pl. 53 figs a–d. — Dick et al. 2005: 3752, fig. 18c–d. Material examined USA • 1 living colony of 30 zooids, none ovicellate, on rock; California, Black Sand Beach; 40°24′50.5074″ N, 124°23′48.1056″ W; 9 Jun. 2020; I.A. Chowdhury and H. Lee leg.; SBMNH 704776a • 1 colony of 20 zooids, none ovicellate, on rock; California, Black Sand Beach; 40°24′50.5074″ N, 124°23′48.1056″ W; 9 Jun. 2020; I.A. Chowdhury and H. Lee leg.; SBMNH 704776b • 1 colony of 60 zooids, 18 ovicellate, on rock; California, Black Sand Beach; 40°24′50.5074″ N, 124°23′48.1056″ W; 9 Jun. 2020; I.A. Chowdhury and H. Lee leg.; SBMNH 704776c • 1 colony of 30 zooids, none ovicellate, on rock; California, Black Sand Beach; 40°24′50.5074″ N, 124°23′48.1056″ W; 9 Jun. 2020; I.A. Chowdhury and H. Lee leg.; SBMNH 704776d • 1 colony of 40 zooids, none ovicellate, on rock; California Black Sand Beach; 40°24′50.5074″ N, 124°23′48.1056″ W; 9 Jun. 2020; I.A. Chowdhury and H. Lee leg.; SBMNH 704776e • 1 colony of 60 zooids, 13 ovicellate, on rock; California, Black Sand Beach; 40°24′50.5074″ N, 124°23′48.1056″ W; 9 Jun. 2020; I.A. Chowdhury and H. Lee leg.; SBMNH 704776f. Description Colony encrusting, multiserial, unilaminar, forming subcircular patches, typically encrusting rocks of various sizes; pore chamber windows visible at the colony growing edge (Fig. 9E), circular to elliptical, three on distal margin and 4–5 on each distolateral vertical wall. Autozooids rounded hexagonal or irregularly polygonal, ZL = 377–540 µm (470±48 µm, N = 20), ZW = 272–439 µm (348±45 µm, N = 20), mean L/W = 1.30; boundaries marked by grooves between slightly raised vertical walls. Frontal shield flat to slightly convex, finely granular, with 52–89 circular pseudopores (D = 5–12 µm) and 10–12 circular to elliptical, marginal areolae per side, clearly distinguishable from pseudopores by their larger size (D = 10–22 µm) (Fig. 9A–B). Primary orifice transversely D-shaped, OL = 114–139 µm (124±8 µm, N = 10), OW = 120–148 µm (133±8 µm, N = 10), mean OL/OW = 0.93, mean ZL/OL = 3.80; outlined by rim of smooth gymnocyst; hinge-line straight, smooth, with two low, trapezoidal condyles at corners (Fig. 9C). Two oral spines observed in some zooids, later obscured by secondary calcification or ovicell (Fig. 9F). Ascopore unusually small, circular (18–25 µm in diameter), with smooth margin, covering plate lacking (Fig. 9C); at same level as adjacent frontal shield, 2–3 ascopore widths from orifice, outlined by rim of gymnocystal calcification independent from that encircling orifice. Avicularia small, single or paired, AvL = 40–51 µm (46±4 µm, N = 7), AvW = 21–30 µm (25±3 µm, N = 7), mean AvL/AvW = 1.85; located distally at same level as ascopore (Fig. 9C); crossbar complete (Fig. 9D); rostrum rounded-triangular, directed laterally or slightly distolaterally, rostrum tip only slightly raised. Mandible not observed. Ovicell prominent, round, wider than long (Fig. 9A, D); OvL = 194–281 µm (242±33 µm, N = 6), OvW = 305–363 µm (332±21 µm, N = 7), mean OvL/OvW = 0.73; continuous with frontal shield of next distal zooid, obscuring distal margin of maternal orifice; calcification finely granular like that of frontal shield but with marked ribs; perforated by small pseudopores, 5–14 µm in maximum dimension. Aberrant kenozooids smaller than autozooids or nearly as large, lacking opening such as orifice and ascopore but equipped with avicularium (Fig. 9B, see asterisks). Ancestrula not observed. Remarks Our material fits the description of Microporella setiformis, a species originally described from British Columbia, Canada (O’Donoghue & O’Donoghue 1923). Distribution and ecology Microporella setiformis has been recorded from intertidal waters to over 100 m depth. The species ranges from Ketchikan, Alaska (Dick et al. 2005) southward Channel Islands in southern California (Soule et al. 1995).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.020 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".