MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6967466236 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.11030391

Microporella setiformis O'Donoghue & O'Donoghue 1923

2024· article· en· W6967466236 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLinguistic, Cultural, and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydrology (agriculture)LimitingDitchTable (database)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microporella setiformis O’Donoghue & O’Donoghue, 1923 Fig. 9, Table 2 Microporella setiformis O’Donoghue & O’Donoghue, 1923: 174, pl. 3 fig. 21. Microporella setiformis – Osburn 1952: 385, pl. 44 fig. 8. — Soule et al. 1995: 150, pl. 53 figs a–d. — Dick et al. 2005: 3752, fig. 18c–d. Material examined USA • 1 living colony of 30 zooids, none ovicellate, on rock; California, Black Sand Beach; 40°24′50.5074″ N, 124°23′48.1056″ W; 9 Jun. 2020; I.A. Chowdhury and H. Lee leg.; SBMNH 704776a • 1 colony of 20 zooids, none ovicellate, on rock; California, Black Sand Beach; 40°24′50.5074″ N, 124°23′48.1056″ W; 9 Jun. 2020; I.A. Chowdhury and H. Lee leg.; SBMNH 704776b • 1 colony of 60 zooids, 18 ovicellate, on rock; California, Black Sand Beach; 40°24′50.5074″ N, 124°23′48.1056″ W; 9 Jun. 2020; I.A. Chowdhury and H. Lee leg.; SBMNH 704776c • 1 colony of 30 zooids, none ovicellate, on rock; California, Black Sand Beach; 40°24′50.5074″ N, 124°23′48.1056″ W; 9 Jun. 2020; I.A. Chowdhury and H. Lee leg.; SBMNH 704776d • 1 colony of 40 zooids, none ovicellate, on rock; California Black Sand Beach; 40°24′50.5074″ N, 124°23′48.1056″ W; 9 Jun. 2020; I.A. Chowdhury and H. Lee leg.; SBMNH 704776e • 1 colony of 60 zooids, 13 ovicellate, on rock; California, Black Sand Beach; 40°24′50.5074″ N, 124°23′48.1056″ W; 9 Jun. 2020; I.A. Chowdhury and H. Lee leg.; SBMNH 704776f. Description Colony encrusting, multiserial, unilaminar, forming subcircular patches, typically encrusting rocks of various sizes; pore chamber windows visible at the colony growing edge (Fig. 9E), circular to elliptical, three on distal margin and 4–5 on each distolateral vertical wall. Autozooids rounded hexagonal or irregularly polygonal, ZL = 377–540 µm (470±48 µm, N = 20), ZW = 272–439 µm (348±45 µm, N = 20), mean L/W = 1.30; boundaries marked by grooves between slightly raised vertical walls. Frontal shield flat to slightly convex, finely granular, with 52–89 circular pseudopores (D = 5–12 µm) and 10–12 circular to elliptical, marginal areolae per side, clearly distinguishable from pseudopores by their larger size (D = 10–22 µm) (Fig. 9A–B). Primary orifice transversely D-shaped, OL = 114–139 µm (124±8 µm, N = 10), OW = 120–148 µm (133±8 µm, N = 10), mean OL/OW = 0.93, mean ZL/OL = 3.80; outlined by rim of smooth gymnocyst; hinge-line straight, smooth, with two low, trapezoidal condyles at corners (Fig. 9C). Two oral spines observed in some zooids, later obscured by secondary calcification or ovicell (Fig. 9F). Ascopore unusually small, circular (18–25 µm in diameter), with smooth margin, covering plate lacking (Fig. 9C); at same level as adjacent frontal shield, 2–3 ascopore widths from orifice, outlined by rim of gymnocystal calcification independent from that encircling orifice. Avicularia small, single or paired, AvL = 40–51 µm (46±4 µm, N = 7), AvW = 21–30 µm (25±3 µm, N = 7), mean AvL/AvW = 1.85; located distally at same level as ascopore (Fig. 9C); crossbar complete (Fig. 9D); rostrum rounded-triangular, directed laterally or slightly distolaterally, rostrum tip only slightly raised. Mandible not observed. Ovicell prominent, round, wider than long (Fig. 9A, D); OvL = 194–281 µm (242±33 µm, N = 6), OvW = 305–363 µm (332±21 µm, N = 7), mean OvL/OvW = 0.73; continuous with frontal shield of next distal zooid, obscuring distal margin of maternal orifice; calcification finely granular like that of frontal shield but with marked ribs; perforated by small pseudopores, 5–14 µm in maximum dimension. Aberrant kenozooids smaller than autozooids or nearly as large, lacking opening such as orifice and ascopore but equipped with avicularium (Fig. 9B, see asterisks). Ancestrula not observed. Remarks Our material fits the description of Microporella setiformis, a species originally described from British Columbia, Canada (O’Donoghue & O’Donoghue 1923). Distribution and ecology Microporella setiformis has been recorded from intertidal waters to over 100 m depth. The species ranges from Ketchikan, Alaska (Dick et al. 2005) southward Channel Islands in southern California (Soule et al. 1995).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicLinguistic, Cultural, and Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207