MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6967511027 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10994135

Philobrya magellanica

2024· article· en· W6967511027 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal plant biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsType (biology)BeagleTaxonomy (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Philobrya magellanica (Stempell, 1899) (Figure 12) Avicula (Meleagrina) magellanica Stempell, 1899: 230, pl. 12, figs. 13‒15. Stempelleria magellanica. Clasing 1918: 22-26. Avicula (Stempellia) magellanica. Odhner, 1922: 221. Philobrya capillata. Linse 2002: fig. 9.1.2-15; Jackson et al. 2015: fig. 3E. (Not Dell, 1964: 170: text figs. 2.5, 2.9, pl. 4, figs. 4, 5). Type localities: Punta Arenas, [53°10’S 70°54’W], 10 fathoms [18.3 m] and Bahía San Nicolás, [53°50’S 71°07’W], 15 fathoms [27.4 m], Strait of Magellan. Material examined: Photographs of a syntype from Punta Arenas (ZMB-Moll 51991). Strait of Magellan: Punta Arenas, [53°10’S 70°54’W] (MACN-In 12342-1: 1 spec); Canal David, 53°38.48’S 72°22.86’W, 40 m (MLP- Ma 16119: 10 spec, 1 v); Bahía Nash, 53°42’S 72°21’W, 30 m (MLP-Ma 16120: 1 spec); Cabo Holand, 53°48.63’S 71°37.46’W, 15‒25 m (MLP-Ma 16121: 1 spec); Bahía Rosa, 53°52.75’S 71°13.33’W, 25‒30 m (MLP-Ma 16122: 2 v). Beagle Channel: Dos Lomos, 54°51’S 68°19’W, 5‒10 m (MLP-Ma 16123: 1 spec); Bahía Ushuaia, 54°50’S 68°15’W, 18‒21 m (MLP-Ma 16124: 1 spec); Isla Conejo, 54°50.88’S 68°14.67’W, 16 m (MACN-In 44452: 2 spec, 6 v); Pozo Ángel, 54°50’S 68°14’W, 21 m (MLP-Ma 16125: 3 v); Puerto Carelo, 54°52’S 68°13’W, 12‒20 m (MLP-Ma 16126: 1 spec); Punta Segunda: 54°52’S 68°18’W, 74‒98 m (MLP-Ma 16127: 1 spec), 54°52’S 68°07’W, 21‒23 m (MLP-Ma 16128: 1 spec), 54°50.90’S 68°02.80’W, 12 m (MACN-In 44453: 4 spec, 3 v), 54°51.27’S 68°02.15’W, 14 m (MACN-In 44454: 1 spec), 54°51.27’S 68°02.12’W, 19 m (MACN-In 44455: 4 spec, 4 v); Isla Becasses, 54°57’S 67°01’W, 30‒40 m (MLP-Ma 16129: 6 spec, 1 v); Paso Richmond, [55°16’S 66°45’W] (MACNIn 24951: 1 spec); Monte Moat, 55°02’S 66°42’W, 15‒20 m (MLP-Ma 16130: 4 spec, 13 v); Cabo San Pío: 55°03’S 66°37’W, 30‒35 m (MLP-Ma 16131: 8 v), 55°06’S 66°29’W, 65‒80 m (MLP-Ma 16132: 2 spec, 3 v). Atlantic coast of Patagonia: Santa Cruz Province: Puerto Deseado: 47°45.30’S 65°52.90’W, intertidal (MACN-In 44445: 7 v), 47°45.41’S 65°52.64’W (MACN-In 44446: 1 spec), 47°45.42’S 65°52.60’W (MACN-In 44447: 1 spec), 47°45.54’S 65°52.20’W (MACN-In 44448: 1 spec), [47°45’S 65°55’W] (MACN-In 44449: 1 spec), 47°46.90’S 65°52.80’W, 6 m (MACN-In 44450: 1 spec, 1 v), 47°47.30’S 65°52.50’W, 8‒9 m (MACN-In 44451: 1 spec, 7 v). Tierra del Fuego Province: Río Grande [53°47’S 67°41’W] (MACN-In 12622: 1 spec). Isla de los Estados: Puerto Cook, [54°46’S 64°03’W] (MACN-In 35219: 1 spec); Puerto Vancouver, 54°52.44’S 64°03.37’W, 271 m (MACNIn 44456: 5 v). Burdwood Bank: 54°31.68’S 61°27.98’W, 137 m (MACN-In 44457: 21 spec, 34 v); 54°28.49’S 60°56.46’W, 102 m (MACN-In 44458: 43 v); 54°29.74’S 60°12.59’W, 95 m (MACN-In 44459: 3 spec, 8 v); 54°16.67’S 59°57.79’W, 96 m (MACN-In 44460: 2 spec, 27 v); 54°30.39’S 59°48.65’W, 105 m (MACN-In 44461: 17 v); 54°24.21’S 59°32.49’W, 86 m (MACN-In 44462: 4 spec, 39 v); 54°28.83’S 59°11.67’W, 122 m (MACN-In 44463: 2 spec, 14 v); 54°23.82’S 58°30.53’W, 135 m (MACN-In 44464: 1 spec, 5 v); 54°11.54’S 58°19.88’W, 90 m (MACN-In 44465: 1 spec, 10 v). Distribution: Atlantic coast of Patagonia, from Santa Cruz Province (this study) to Cape Horn (Linse 2002), Isla de los Estados (this study), Burdwood Bank (this study), Strait of Magellan (Stempell 1899; this study) and Beagle Channel (this study); intertidal to 430 m (living specimens: 5‒137 m). Description: Shell large (maximum L = 11 mm, fide Stempell, 1899), ovate to subcircular, high (H/L = 0.91 ± 0.03, n = 30), compressed (W/H = 0.53 ± 0.03, n = 30), moderately solid; with a wide, flat dorsal slope. Umbo narrow, pointed, subterminal, markedly ventrally curved; not outstanding from shell outline in smaller specimens, but somewhat projected in larger specimens. Umbonal angle: 100‒115° (n = 21). Dorsal margin with the anterior portion long, straight to slightly convex, markedly oblique forward and the posterior portion broadly arched, forming a continuous curve with the posterior margin. Ventral margin nearly straight in smaller specimens, becoming increasingly concave with growth. Prodissoconch D-shaped, with posterior end higher than anterior end, moderately projected ventrally, of 400‒ 430 µm Lp (n = 10), raised from dissoconch. Antero-dorsal and postero-dorsal areas sculptured with densely packed commarginal folds. Central area sculptured with microscopic pits. Pits ovate, forming numerous arcs that radiate from the apex and intersect at right angles, forming a quincuncial pattern. Dissoconch whitish, dull, sculptured with 15‒20 faint radial ribs. Periostracum thick, yellow to yellowish brown, extending up to 2 mm beyond calcified shell margin; forming low commarginal and radial folds; setae missing. Inner shell surface and shell margins smooth. Posterior adductor muscle scar located in the antero-posterior half of the valves, dorsally displaced. Hinge: Anterior and posterior series of G1b teeth forming an angle of 164‒172° (n = 8). All teeth in both series well-recognizable in specimens up to a length of 1.6 mm. Distal teeth of the posterior series partially disintegrated, forming pustules, in specimens longer than 2.0 mm. Distal teeth of the anterior series also forming pustules in specimens longer than 4.3 mm. Resilifer long and wide. Remarks: The narrowly pointed umbo and the periostracum with commarginal and radial folds, but lack of setae make Philobrya magellanica an easily recognizable species. Another species lacking periostracal setae is P. quadrata (Fig. 15), which, however, differs from P. magellanica by having a wider umbo and lack of radial periostracal folds. In addition, P. magellanica have larger umbonal angle (100‒115° vs. 85‒95°, respectively) and less evident posterior area of shell than P. quadrata. In general shell shape P. magellanica also resembles P. sublaevis (Fig. 17), from which it differs by its hooked umbo, pitted prodissoconch and lack of periostracal lamellae and setae (see Appendix 1). The specimens figured by Jackson et al. (2015: figs. 2G, 3G) as P. magellanica correspond to P. capillata.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicMarine and coastal plant biology→French-language works237,207→