MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6967656365 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10167197

Gymnusa atra Casey 1911

2023· article· en· W6967656365 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicColeoptera Taxonomy and Distribution
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources CanadaAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaCanadian Forest Service
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMarshCarexSwampVegetation (pathology)WetlandBogSphagnum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

143. Gymnusa atra Casey * (Illustrations in Klimaszewski et al. 1979, 2018, 2021), Table 1 References. Casey 1911. Klimaszewski 1979, 1982. Klimaszewski and Génier 1985. Majka and Klimaszewski 2010. Klimaszewski et al. 2011, 2018, 2020, 2021. Distribution. Holarctic, transcontinental in Canada, recorded from A/S (Klimaszewski et al. 2021). Canada: AB, BC, LB, MB, NB, NF, NS, NT, ON, QC, YT. USA: AK, IL, IA, MA, ME, MI, MN, NH, NY. France: St. Pierre and Miquelon. Russia (eastern). China (northeastern). Collection and Habitat data. In NH captured in litter and taken by a FIT. Collected in April–May and September. Elsewhere found in tamarack (Larix laricina (Du Roi)) and black spruce (Picea mariana (Mill.) B.S.P.)) bogs, marshy pond and lake margins, cattail/ Carex marshes, and marshy margins of slow flowing rivers. Adults usually found in Carex hummocks, moist to wet Sphagnum with Carex, and in saturated marsh vegetation (Klimaszewski et al. 2021). Material. USA, Maine, Hancock Co.: Great Heath, Bar Harbor, 5.X.1944, A.E. Brower, on willow, 2 sex? Kennebec Co.: Winslow, 21.VII.2005, D.R. Bourque, 1 sex? Oxford Co.: Lincoln Tract Bog, 5 mi S Wilsons Mills, 15.VIII.1954, D.S. Chandler, treading, 3 sex? Massachusetts, Middlesex Co.: Groton, 13.I.2008, T. Murray, 1 sex? Spencer Circle, 1 km E West Groton, 4.VI.2020, T. Murray, UV lt., 1 sex? New Hampshire, Coos Co.: Mt. Washington, Lakes of the Clouds, 5000’, 10.IX.1987, A. Smetana (CNC), 1 sex? Rockingham Co.: Hampton, 15.IV.1925, S.A. Shaw, sifting, 1 sex?; 15.IV.1917, S.A. Shaw, 1 sex? Strafford Co.: 1 mi SW Durham, 12–26.V.1987, D.S. Chandler, FIT, 1 female. Canada, Ontario, Mer Bleue, 6 mi E Ottawa, sift alder leaf litter, 1 sex?; 28.X.1987, D.S. Chandler, sift grass & leaf litter, 1 sex?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.151

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0450.024

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicColeoptera Taxonomy and DistributionFrench-language works237,207