Dalotia coriaria AB, BC, NB, NS, ON, QC
Bibliographic record
Abstract
83. Dalotia coriaria (Kraatz) † (Illustrations in Klimaszewski et al. 2018), Table 1 References. Kraatz 1856. Bernhauer 1906, 1907. Casey 1910 (as Pseudota miscella Casey, Dimetrota crucialis Casey, and D. pectorina Casey). Frank 1981. Muona 1984. Klimaszewski and Peck 1998. Gusarov 2003. Klimaszewski et al. 2007a, 2009a, 2013 a, 2018. Webster et al. 2009. Distribution. Palearctic, now cosmopolitan, adventive in Canada and the USA. Canada: AB, BC, NB, NS, ON, QC. USA: CA, FL, LA, MA, NH (NSR), NJ, NY. Collection and Habitat data. The NH specimens were found in greenhouses and in a house. Collected in February, April, October, and November. In Canada common in compost (decaying corncobs and vegetables) near a mixed forest, under decaying seaweed on sea beach, and one was taken from a Lindgren funnel trap in a silver maple swamp (Webster et al. 2009). From other areas reported from rotting organic materials (grass heaps, carrion, mushrooms), and from forest litter (Klimaszewski et al. 2018). Material. USA, New Hampshire, Rockingham Co.: Brentwood, 28.XI.1977, homeowner, in house, 1 male, 2 females, 4 sex? Hampton, 20.IV.1926, S.A. Shaw, 1 male. Strafford Co.: Dover, 17.X.1965, 1 female. Durham, 20.II.1963, W.J. Morse, in greenhouse, 1 female; 11.X.1954, R.L. Blickle, 1 female; 9.VIII.1954, 2 females; 11.X.1954, R.L. Blickle, 1 male, 2 females; 20.II.1963, W.J. Morse, greenhouse, 9 females. Lee, 1.VII.1954, R.L. Blickle, 1 male. Comments. This species is a predator of small arthropods, and is used in North America as a biological control agent in greenhouses (Pochubay and Grieshop 2012).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.024 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".