The Ultimate Share-Everything Pdes System
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<pre>The share-everything PDES (Parallel Discrete Event Simulation) paradigm is based on fully sharing the possibility to process any individual event across concurrent threads, rather than binding Logical Processes (LPs) and their events to threads. It allows concentrating, at any time, the computing power---the CPU-cores on board of a shared-memory machine---towards the unprocessed events that stand closest to the current commit horizon of the simulation run. This fruitfully biases the delivery of the computing power towards the hot portion of the model execution trajectory. In this article we present an innovative share-everything PDES system that provides (1) fully non-blocking coordination of the threads when accessing shared data structures and (2) fully speculative processing capabilities---Time Warp style processing---of the events. As we show via an experimental study, our proposal can cope with hard workloads where both classical Time Warp systems---based on LPs to threads binding---and previous share-everything proposal---not able to exploit fully speculative processing of the events---tend to fail in delivering adequate performance.</pre>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.025 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".