MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6967757619 · doi:10.52155/ijpsat.v37.1.5080

Development Planning Based On Data Desa Presisi In Tapanuli Utara Regency, North Sumatra Province

2023· article· en· W6967757619 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies (Medical University Varna) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPublic Administration in Developing Nations
Canadian institutionsInstitute on Governance
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRegional developmentQuality (philosophy)Field researchField (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The success of development policies is determined by the availability of data and the ability to carry out good program planning. This study aims to look at the current conditions of regional development (especially in the field of basic services) and the achievement of the Key Performance Indicators (KPI) of regional development referring to cases in three research locations: Sibandang Village, Sidagal Village, and Hutatoruan I Village in North Tapanuli Regency, North Sumatra . The research uses a descriptive quantitative approach based on Data Desa Presisi (DDP). This study found that the lowest achievement of basic services was in Sidagal Village and the highest quality of basic services was found in Hutatoruan I Village. For this reason, this study recommends that the findings obtained be used as the basis for DDP-based regional development planning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.607
Threshold uncertainty score0.535

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it