MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6967804027 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10082442

A Research Review on the Evolution of Urdu Fiction in West Bengal

2023· other· en· W6967804027 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiterary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUrduPopularityWest bengalWelshPoetry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bengal has also played a special role in the evolution of Urdu language like other regions. As the education of Fort William College flourished in Bengal, Urdu prose flourished. But this does not prove that Urdu prose also originated from the time of Fort William College. On the contrary, current research indicates that Urdu prose existed even before . From 1800 to 1828 the activities of Fort William College continued with vigor. In this short period, Urdu prose developed a lot and gained an important place in Urdu literature. Mir Aman, Haider Bakhsh Haidari, Mazhar Ali Khan Villa, Beni Narayan, Nihal Chandla Hori, Mirza Ali Lutf, Mir Bahadur Ali Hussaini and other writers lifted Urdu prose from the floor and enthroned it in Bengal. This is the reason why in the latter half of the nineteenth century the Urdu language was able to express the modern trends, contemporary demands and problems of life with simplicity and ease, but unfortunately Lord Welsh and Sir John Gilchrist were disaffected and disturbed by the company. Had to resign. After these people left, the golden age of the college ended. If these people had stayed here for some time, the development and popularity of Urdu prose would have increased further. However, after the closure of the college on the order of Lord Dalhousie in 1854, the development of prose literature of Bengal was affected to a great extent, but what happened was that the Fort William movement gave Bengal the first place in the history of Urdu prose. In this connection, it is also worth mentioning that the first Urdu newspaper 'Jam Jahan Nama' was published from Bengal in 1822 under the editorship of Harihardt. Camps were first established here. Science and arts books were authored, compiled and translated. The work of printing and publishing also started in relation to dictionary, rules, history, geography, science and medicine and thus the prose developed such a breadth and capacity that it started conveying every subject in common language. In the latter half of the 19th century, though the focus on prose literature waned, the light of the candle lit by the Fort William College spread from Bengal to the rest of the country. Under his influence, the Sir Syed movement gave more energy and scope to Urdu prose

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.283
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0920.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicLiterary Theory and Cultural HermeneuticsFrench-language works237,207