MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6967826191 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.14342522

Hadronotus galdikasae Veenakumari 2024, sp. n.

2024· article· en· W6967826191 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLinguistic, Cultural, and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSculptureTransverse planeScapulaKeelDorsum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hadronotus galdikasae Veenakumari sp. n. http://www.zoobank.org/ urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub: DDC4C15B-CE75-4FB8-817E-085DC34AD3ED (Figures 7 (a–g), 26(f)) Female body length = 1.05–1.15 mm (n = 2). Colour. Head, mesosoma and metasoma black; all coxae and femur dark brown, remainder of leg brown-yellow; clypeus yellow-brown; mandible yellow-brown with black-brown teeth; entire antenna yellow-brown. Head. 1.6× as wide as high, 1.2× as high as long. IOS: 0.6× head width, 1.3× eye length. POL: LOL: OOL: 17.6: 7.9: 2.9. OOL: subequal to MOD. Compound eye: ovate (L: W = 17.7: 14.3). Sculpture of orbital furrow: foveate. Inner orbits in frontal view: converging dorsally. Central keel on frons: present, extending half the length of frontal depression. Malar sulcus: indicated as a furrow with rugose sculpture. Shape of frontal depression: triangular. L: W of frontal depression: 21.5: 28.9. Width of frontal depression: 1.2× IOS. Sculpture of frontal depression: with discontinuous transverse carinae dorsally, space between carinae smooth; ventrally with sparse transverse carinae on either side of central keel, in addition to curved or crescent shaped carinae laterally with reticulations between carinae; reticulate ventrally. Submedial carina of frontal depression: entire. AOD in dorsal view: 3× OOL. Sculpture of frons sans frontal depression: foveate, setose. Sculpture of vertex: with polygonal cells, setose. Hyperoccipital carina: present. Sculpture of gena: weakly foveate. Mesosoma. L: W of mesoscutum: 24.1: 37.5. Sculpture of mesoscutum: coriaceous reticulations with longitudinal carinae posteriorly. Scutoscutellar sulcus: foveate. L: W of mesoscutellum: 9.8: 28.8. Sculpture of mesoscutellum: coriaceous reticulate with sparse longitudinal carinae, setose posterolaterally. Posterior mesoscutellar sulcus: foveate. Sculpture of metascutellum: anteriorly foveate, posteriorly smooth. Posterior margin of metascutellum: semicircular. Sculpture of metanotal trough: foveate. Lateral propodeal area: laterally wide and narrowing centrad, with a weak medial notch. Sculpture of lateral propodeal area: with depressions. Posterior propodeal projection: not pointed. Pronotal cervical sulcus: with depressions. Sculpture of lateral pronotal area: dorsally foveate, ventrally smooth with transverse carinae. Prespecular sulcus: transversely foveate. Sculpture of speculum: transversely carinate. Femoral depression: transversely carinate, area between carinae smooth. Episternal sulcus: not foveate. Postacetabular sulcus: indicated as furrow. Mesepimeral sulcus: foveate dorsally. Sculpture of posterior mesepimeral area: absent. Mesopleural carina: indicated ventrally. Mesopleural pit: present. Metapleural sulcus: foveate. Sculpture of dorsal metapleural area: foveate, sparsely setose. Sculpture of ventral metapleural area: smooth to rugose, sparsely setose. Paracoxal sulcus: foveate. L: W of fore wing: 71.9: 34.0. Ratio of length of m: st: pm: 2.1: 6.7: 0; postmarginalis absent. L: W of hind wing: 58.1: 15.1. Length of hind wing marginal cilia: 0.18× width of wing. Shape of submarginalis: straight, distant from anterior margin of wing and dips before reaching marginalis. Metasoma. L: W of metasoma: 38.9: 44.3, 0.9 × as long as wide. Anterior margin of T1: almost straight. Basal foveae on T1: present. Sculpture of T1: longitudinally costate, space between costae medially smooth, laterally rugose; posteromedially smooth. Sculpture of T2: finely reticulate; basal foveae absent. Length of T2: 5.9× length of T3. Sculpture of T3– T4: smooth. Setation of metasoma: T1 densely setose laterally; T2 sparsely setose laterally; posterior tergites sparsely setose. Male. Unknown. Material examined Holotype, female (ICAR / NBAIR / P4970), INDIA: Karnataka: Bengaluru, Hebbal, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, 13.023°N, 77.584°E, ca 900 m, YPT, 16 November 2017; Paratype: one female (ICAR / NBAIR / P4971), Karnataka: Bengaluru, GKVK, 13.080°N, 77.578°E, ca 930 m, YPT, 22 May 2013. Etymology This species is named after the Canadian primatologist Birute Mary Galdikas, one of Louis Leakey’s ‘Trimates’ or angels, whose work on the orangutans of Indonesian Borneo for the first time uncovered the solitary lives of the males of these then least known of the great apes, among many other aspects of their lives in the wild. The name is treated as a noun in the genitive case. Diagnosis Hadronotus galdikasae sp. n. is similar to H. circus but differs from it in having an incomplete central keel on the frons, while in H. circus the central keel on frons extends the entire length of the frontal depression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicLinguistic, Cultural, and Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207