ASSESSMENT OF DENTISTS' SELF-REPORTED LEVELS OF INCOME AND BURNOUT DIMENSIONS: A PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this preliminary investigation was to assess dental professionals’ income satisfaction and its related levels of burnout dimensions: EE, DP, and PA. An anonymous descriptive cross-sectional survey was held among 156 dentists working in the capital of Republic of Bulgaria, Sofia. The questionnaire consisted of demographic data and the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS) sections. A total of 136 dentists provided duly completed questionnaires (RR = 90.7%), of which 56 (41.2%) were males. Surprisingly, almost a quarter – 32 (23.5%), reported having unsatisfactory income from dentistry contrary to the notion that this occupation was considered well paid and providing security in this regard. This group of dentists demonstrated higher levels of burnout than those with good or excellent income. They exhibited higher scores mainly in EE and reduced PA subscales. Therefore, recommendations for positive outcomes of dental procedures which are crucial for patient well-being and satisfaction, might have a key role in evaluation of achieved results, including their financial aspect. Ultimately, better compensation, motivation and performance could effectively help reduce the risk of burnout.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".