Sclerocoelus galapagensis Marshall 1997
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sclerocoelus galapagensis Marshall, 1997 Sclerocoelus galapagensis Marshall, 1997: 103. Sclerocoelus galapagensis – Roháček et al. 2001: 249. Diagnosis Body length 2.0– 2.2 mm. Membrane around prosternum with 1–2 small, setulae-bearing sclerites. Male S5 rectangular with a relatively deep posteromedial emargination surrounded by a pair of darkened lobes (cf. Marshall 1997: fig. 34); perianal pads well developed and dark; surstylus relatively short, almost bean-shaped with an inner, anteroventral patch of thickened setae (cf. Marshall 1997: figs 35, 37); postgonite straight, almost rectangular but concave posteroapically (cf. Marshall 1997: fig. 36). Female S8 small with a dark, slightly raised, X-shaped medial ridge (cf. Marshall 1997: fig. 39). Material examined The type specimens deposited in DEBU were examined, as well as the following material: ECUADOR – Galápagos • 1 ♀; Santa Cruz Island, Las Beseles, 31 km N of Santa Rosa; 570 m a.s.l.; 28 Jun. 1985; S. Peck leg.; Scalesia forest, flight-intercept trap and Malaise trap; DEBU • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Santiago Island, 3 km NE of Aquacate Camp; 740 m a.s.l.; 5–9 Jun. 1991; S. Peck leg.; moss elfin forest, flight-intercept trap; DEBU. Distribution Neotropical: Ecuador (Galapagos Islands).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".