Bibliographic record
Abstract
MYMAR Curtis, 1829 (Figs 187) Mymar Curtis, 1829: 112. Type species: Mymar pulchellum Curtis, 1832, by designation under the plenary powers of the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature, 1965: 82 (ICZN 1965). See Huber et al. (2020) for generic synonyms and their type species. Diagnosis. Face without subantennal sulcus ventral to each torulus and without pit medial to each torulus; toruli abutting transverse trabecula; scape, especially in female, unusually long and slightly constricted medially (Fig. 187); fore wing extremely narrow for about 0.6 × its length (Fig. 187), hind wing filamentous (Fig. 187); propodeum without median carina except perhaps a very short one; petiole attached to gt 1. Remarks. Mymar belongs to the Polynema group of genera. Mymar, Neomymar and Tetrapolynema are the only genera of the group that have the toruli in contact with the transverse trabecula. Mymar is most easily distinguished by the combination of mostly narrow fore wing with a distinct dark apical spot in the enlarged apical section, and the hind wing without membrane but consisting only of venation. Neotropical hosts. Unknown. Important reference. Triapitsyn (2018a) [includes a world key to Mymar species].
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.035 | 0.019 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".