MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6968044237 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15778689

Alliance Cloud Connect Pilot (ACCP) - 2025 DRI Connect poster

2025· article· en· W6968044237 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicScientific Computing and Data Management
Canadian institutionsToronto Dementia Research Alliance
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCloud computingAllianceMandateListing (finance)Resource (disambiguation)Gateway (web page)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Poster created for DRI Connect 2025 (English version). --- We understand that researchers in Canada require more efficient access to compute, software and data through community and commercial clouds. Through the Alliance Cloud Connect Pilot (ACCP), we aim to build national cloud research capacity and deliver on our mandate to meet the increasing digital research infrastructure (DRI) resource demand from the Canadian research community. Below is a listing of the commercial vendors, open-source developers, universities and researchers who are working together on a cutting-edge portal that will transform access to community and commercial cloud services in Canada. Thank you to everyone who is participating in the pilot!

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.903
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0040.000
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.031

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.150
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicScientific Computing and Data ManagementFrench-language works237,207