Bone fractures in upper and lower extremities and occupational performances in childhood
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectives: Bone fractures in the upper and lower extremities in childhood represent a significant health issue that affects a child's daily activities. The aim of this research was to determine the impact of fractures on a child's everyday occupational performances. Methods: A prospective study conducted over a 4-month period included 36 participants of both genders, up to 18 years old, treated at the Clinic for Child Habilitation and Rehabilitation in Novi Sad, Serbia, with prior consent from the child and their parents/guardians and approval from the Ethics Committee. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) was used to assess occupational performances. Results: In the total sample (n=36; 25 males (69%)), the average age was 9.94 years. Fractures of the upper extremity were most commonly observed (58%), followed by 31% lower extremity fractures and 11% fractures in both upper and lower extremities. In the domain of personal care, 8 occupational activities were challenging (most commonly brushing teeth (26%) and washing the face (22%)). In the domain of functional mobility, patientsreported 6 difficulties (most commonly riding a bicycle (34%) and walking up and down stairs (22%)). In the community navigation domain, the greatest difficulty was using elevators (80%) and 34% of respondents reported difficulties in using their free time and socializing with friends. Conclusions: Fractures in the upper and lower extremities during childhood affect independence, self-care, functional mobility, and daily functioning. Recognizing these difficulties and providing timely rehabilitation to address them can contribute to a faster recovery for the child.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".