Monepidosis scepteri Spungis 2006
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Monepidosis scepteri Spungis, 2006 Morphological identification Spungis (2006b). DNA barcode CO1 sequences (651‒653bp) were obtained of the 11 specimens listed below and allocated to two BINs, BOLD:ACT8511 (ZSM-DIP-42305-A03, from Bavaria) and BOLD:AEO7958 (all other specimens, from Baden-Württemberg). My reexamination of these specimens failed to find morphological evidence in support of the genetic clustering. Search on BOLD’s BIN Database (accessed 27 Aug. 2023) retrieved a further four matches for BOLD:ACT8511, all as Cecidomyiidae sp. from Canada (three matches) and Bulgaria (one). Material examined GERMANY ‒ Baden-Württemberg • 1 ♂; Malsch, Luderbusch; 48°91′61″ N, 8°33′18″ E; elev. 111 m; 12‒26 Apr. 2020; D. Doczkal and K. Grabow leg.; Malaise trap; windthrow of birch trees; BOLD GBDTA9986-21; ZSM-DIP-42304-A11 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding but 48°91′50″ N, 8°33′19″ E; elev. 113 m; 26 Apr.‒3 May 2020; willow scrub; BOLD GBDTA10022-21; ZSM-DIP-42304-D11 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding but 48°91′28″ N, 8°33′35″ E; elev. 111 m; 17‒24 May 2020; willow scrub and reed; BOLD DTIII8545-22; ZSM-DIP-42474-H06 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding but 48°91′44″ N, 8°33′24″ E; elev. 112 m; 10‒17 May 2020; willow/aspen forest and game browsing field; BOLD DTIII8614-22; ZSM-DIP-42475-F04 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding but 48°91′20″ N, 8°33′26″ E; elev. 112 m; 17‒24 May 2020; windthrow of willow and aspen trees; BOLD DTIII8701-22; ZSM-DIP-42476-E08 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; BOLD DTIII8745-22; ZSM-DIP-42477-A05 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; BOLD DTIII8751-22; ZSM-DIP-42477-A11 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding but 48°91′20″ N, 8°33′22″ E; elev. 112 m; 26 Apr.‒3 May 2020; windthrow of aspen trees; BOLD DTIII8889-22; ZSM-DIP-42478-E06 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; BOLD DTIII8896-22; ZSM-DIP-42478-F01. ‒ Bavaria • 1 ♂; Upper Bavaria, Rudelzhausen; 48°57′84″ N, 11°86′26″ E; elev. 520 m; 16 Jul. 2019; LandKlif and J. Müller leg.; Malaise trap; BOLD GBDTA10073-21; ZSM-DIP-42305-A03. Distribution Germany (new record); Sweden, Latvia (Gagné & Jaschhof 2021).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".