Bibliographic record
Abstract
XENOPOLYNEMA Ogloblin, 1960 (Figs 345–349) Xenopolynema Ogloblin, 1960a: 9. Type species: Xenopolynema areolatum Ogloblin, 1960, by original designation. Diagnosis. Face without subantennal sulcus ventral to each torulus, with a pit medially next to each torulus and toruli separated by about their own height from transverse trabecula (Fig. 345a); propleura widely abutting medially anterior to prosternum; fore wing with a narrow dark transverse band posterior to venation; parastigma lengthened, slightly separated from anterior margin of wing, and marginal vein apparently absent (Fig. 347); propodeum submedially with 2 curved carina meeting dorsally, forming an oval median area (Fig. 348); petiole attached posteriorly to gs 1 (Fig. 349). Remarks. Xenopolynema belongs to the Polynema group of genera. Among the Neotropical genera, Xenopolynema appears superficially to be most similar to Vladimir based on the more or less lengthened parastigma (+ marginal vein, when present) + stigmal veins and the dark transverse band posterior to these but instead is most similar to the Australasian genus Boccacciomymar Triapitsyn & Berezovskiy. Neotropical hosts. Unknown. Important reference. Ogloblin (1960a).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".