MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6968136224 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.14620362

10x Visium Spatial Transcriptomics Dataset: Kidney (3) and Lung (5) Cancer with Tertiary Lymphoid Structures

2025· dataset· en· W6968136224 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLungCancerKidney cancerKidneyH&E stainLung cancerTranscriptome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The kidney and lung cancer dataset with tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) consists of 5 μm thick FFPE sections from kidney (3) and lung (5) tumors obtained from the Institute of Pathology at the University Hospital of Zurich, mounted onto Visium slides with the Human Probe Set v1. The samples were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and subsequently processed for sequencing following the manufacturer's recommendations. After library preparation, the samples were sequenced on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 and preprocessed using Space Ranger v2.1.0. Patient analyses were conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval for performing research on anonymized, archival patient material was obtained from the Cantonal Ethics Commission of Zurich (BASEC Nr. 2022-01854 and BASEC Nr. 2024-01428). Spatial transcriptomics sequencing was performed at the Functional Genomics Center Zurich (FGCZ) of University of Zurich and ETH Zurich. The Visium spots were annotated in the corresponding H&E images by expert researchers (K.S. and S.D.) and included manual annotations with the following labels: TLS, Immune, Tumor, Normal, and Unassigned. Data samples include KC[1-3] indicating kidney cancer and LC[1-5] indicating lung cancer. K.N performed the manual fiducial alignment and tissue detection on the high-resolution images using Loupe Browser 8.0.0 and preprocesseed the AnnData objects. Data summary: 1) 10x_Visium contains the Space Ranger v2.1.0 output (raw matrix, filtered matrix and spatial information including scaled images). 2) h5ad contains preprocessed AnnData objects along with the manual annotations. 3) tif_slides contains the high-resolution images along with aligned spot coordinates. Folder structure: ├── 10x_Visium │ ├── KC1 │ │ ├── filtered_feature_bc_matrix │ │ ├── raw_feature_bc_matrix │ │ └── spatial │ ├── KC2 │ │ ├── filtered_feature_bc_matrix │ │ ├── raw_feature_bc_matrix │ │ └── spatial │ ├── KC3 │ │ ├── filtered_feature_bc_matrix │ │ ├── raw_feature_bc_matrix │ │ └── spatial │ ├── LC1 │ │ ├── filtered_feature_bc_matrix │ │ ├── raw_feature_bc_matrix │ │ └── spatial │ ├── LC2 │ │ ├── filtered_feature_bc_matrix │ │ ├── raw_feature_bc_matrix │ │ └── spatial │ ├── LC3 │ │ ├── filtered_feature_bc_matrix │ │ ├── raw_feature_bc_matrix │ │ └── spatial │ ├── LC4 │ │ ├── filtered_feature_bc_matrix │ │ ├── raw_feature_bc_matrix │ │ └── spatial │ └── LC5 │ ├── filtered_feature_bc_matrix │ ├── raw_feature_bc_matrix │ └── spatial ├── h5ad_preprocessed └── tif_slides

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→French-language works237,207→