Lasconotus tenebrisilvarum Alekseev et Bukejs 2024, sp. nov.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lasconotus tenebrisilvarum Alekseev et Bukejs sp. nov. (Figs 11–16) Type material. Holotype: No. RSKM_PAL_A73 [RSM] (ex coll. Jonas Damzen JDC-13074); “Holotype / Lasconotus tenebrisilvarum sp. nov. / Alekseev et Bukejs des. 2024” [red printed label]; adult, sex unknown. A complete beetle with exposed metathoracic wings is included in a transparent, yellow amber piece with dimensions of 10× 5 mm and a maximum thickness of 5 mm, preserved without supplementary fixation. Syninclusions: one specimen of a phoretic uropod deutonymph (Acari: Mesostigmata: Uropodina) attached to right side of pronotum. Type stratum. Baltic amber from Eocene amber-bearing Blaue Erde deposits; estimated age: middle–late Eocene (Standke 1998). Type locality. Yantarny settlement (formerly Palmnicken), Sambian (Samland) Peninsula, Kaliningrad Region, Russia. Description. Measurements: total body length (including visible part of head) 3.5 mm, maximum body width (across elytra) 1.15 mm; head length 0.4 mm, head width (across eyes) 0.8 mm; pronotal length 0.8 mm, maximum pronotal width 1.0 mm, basal pronotal width 1.0 mm; elytral length (along elytral suture, including scutellum) 2.3 mm. Body subparallel-sided, elongate, about 3.1× as long as wide, weakly convex dorsally and ventrally, unicolorous black (as preserved). Pubescence: head and pronotum with fine, curved setae; elytra sparsely covered with slightly longer, semierect, narrow, uniform setae arranged in rows, and not forming patches. Head prognathous, transverse; densely granulose dorsally, with granules rather large near center of frons, about 2× as wide as diameter of one eye facet, distance between granules distinctly smaller than diameter of one granule, each granule bearing short, curved, narrow seta. Anterior margin of clypeus widely rounded. Compound eyes large, nearly hemispherical, strongly convex, without interfacetal setation. Frons with strong, complete supraocular carinae. Antennal insertions concealed dorsally. Antennal groove ventrad eye absent. Antennae short, extending to about middle of pronotal length; 11-segmented with distinct, loose, flattened, 3-segmented club; sparsely covered with short, semierect setae; scape and pedicel wide, cylindrical, about 1.5× as long as wide; antennomere 3 conical, slightly dilated apically, about 1.4× longer than antennomere 4, narrower than pedicel; antennomeres 4–8 slightly elongate, subcylindrical to subtrapezoidal, slightly dilated apically, subequal in length; antennomere 9 dilated apically, strongly transverse, 2.2× as wide as long, about 2.0× wider than antennomere 8; antennomere 10 widest, strongly transverse, 2.3× as wide as long, about 1.3× wider than antennomere 9; antennomere 11 widely oval, transverse, about 1.3× as wide as long, distinctly narrower than antennomere 10, finely setose, with widely rounded apex. Maxillary palpi with four palpomeres; palpomere 1 smallest, subtriangular; palpomeres 2 and 3 subquadratic, nearly as long as wide, subequal in size and shape; palpomere 4 elongate oval, truncate, about as long as previous palpomeres combined. Terminal labial palpomere subtriangular, acute apically. Pronotum slightly transverse, 1.2× as wide as long, widest at base, almost parallel-sided, slightly narrowed anteriad, maximum pronotal width / basal pronotal width = 1.0; pronotal disc weakly convex, with two pairs of sharp, uninterrupted, sublateral carinae; pronotal surface densely covered with granules, bearing curved setae, distance between granules smaller than diameter of one granule. Outer pair of pronotal sublateral carinae subparallel, slightly curved, and almost forming subrectangular area together with anterior and posterior pronotal margins; inner pair of pronotal carinae curved, forming longitudinal oval median area with truncated ends, interrupted anteriorly and posteriorly. Lateral margins finely crenulate, raised, forming distinct longitudinal depression between the lateral margin and first pair of pronotal sublateral carina; anterior pronotal margin arcuate, slightly raised medially; posterior margin rounded. Anterior pronotal angles prominent, acute, slightly rounded; posterior angles almost rectangular and not projecting posteriorly. Prothoracic notosternal suture complete. Hypomera densely and coarsely granulose, distance between granules smaller than diameter of one granule. Prosternum convex; densely covered with small granules. Intercoxal prosternal process elongate, with rounded apex, narrow, about 0.7× as wide as diameter of procoxa, with fine median carina in apical portion, not expanded apically beyond midpoint of procoxa. Procoxal cavities narrowly open posteriorly. Scutellar shield minute, drop-shaped, slightly transverse, dilated apically. Elytra almost parallel-sided in anterior two-thirds of their lengths, narrowed in posterior one-third, rounded at apex; about 2.0× as long as wide combined; carinate and convex; 2.8× longer than pronotum. Elytral base slightly wider than pronotal posterior margin. Humeral angles rounded. Elytra striate-punctate. Scutellary striole present. Elytral striae with rows of elongate granules; odd elytral intervals (1, 3, 5, 7) carinate; elytral carinae similarly raised along their entire lengths. Epipleura present, well-developed, widest in basal half, narrowing posteriad, incomplete, apparently reaching abdominal ventrite 5, densely covered with round granules. Mesoventrite convex, densely and coarsely punctate. Mesocoxal cavities closed. Metaventrite with disc almost flat, longer than abdominal ventrite 1, with dense and coarse punctation; discrimen distinct in posterior two-thirds. Relative length ratio of pro- to meso- to metaventrite to abdomen approximately equal to 10:6:11:26. Metathoracic wings present. Legs rather short and robust, finely punctate and pubescent. Procoxa nearly rounded, narrowly separated by 0.6× diameter of procoxa; mesocoxae hemispherical, narrowly separated by about 0.3× diameter of mesocoxa; metacoxae oval, transverse, separated by 0.5× longitudinal diameter of metacoxa. Femora elongate oval, dilated medially, flattened; femora and tibiae subequal in length. Tibiae straight, dilated apically, with fringe of stout setae and two spines apically. Tarsi slender, about 0.6× as long as tibia; tarsal formula 4-4-4; tarsomeres with sparse, fine setation ventrally; tarsomere 4 longest, longer than metatarsomeres 1–3 combined, widened distally, slightly curved. Claws simple, large, about 0.3× as long as tarsomere 4. Abdomen with five visible ventrites, abdominal sutures distinct throughout length; densely covered with small punctation. Relative length ratios of ventrites 1–5 equal to 10:5:4:3:3. Abdominal ventrite 1 with small, triangular intercoxal process. Abdominal ventrite 5 with widely rounded apical margin, and with preapical groove. Differential diagnosis. Lasconotus tenebrisilvarum sp. nov. differs from all extant congeners in the combination of the following characters: elytra convex (in contrast to concave elytra of several North American representatives); elytra with elytral carinae similarly raised along entire lengths; pronotum with two pairs of distinct and uninterrupted sublateral carinae; anterior margin of pronotum without distinctive paired tufts of long, golden setae; raised lateral margin of pronotum forming distinct longitudinal depression between lateral margin and first pair of pronotal carina; pronotal margins almost parallel; posterior pronotal angles almost rectangular and not projecting posteriorly; and elytra at base only slightly wider than pronotum. Additionally, L. tenebrisilvarum sp. nov. differs from the majority of the genus representatives in possessing narrowly open procoxal cavities, a character shared with two North American species, L. fitzgibbonae Kingsolver et al., 2006, and L. coronatus Hinton, 1935. The new species can be easily distinguished from other extinct Colydiinae found in Baltic amber based on the combination of generic characters, most obviously in the presence of 11-segmented antennae with a 3-segmented club, pronotum with two pairs of sublateral carinae, presence of supraocular carina, and carinate elytra. Derivatio nominis. The name of the new species tenebrisilvarum is derived from the Latin “ tenebricae silvae ” in genitive case, meaning “of dark forests”. This refers to the region of the specimen’s origin in two ways: (1) referring to Eocene forest paleohabitats, and (2) to the former Eastern Prussia, a historical area with the informal anthem “Land der dunklen Wälder“ (land of dark forests), written by Erich Hannighofer and Herbert Brust. Distribution of congeners. The genus Lasconotus is cosmopolitan, being represented in the New World by 37 species (Ivie et al. 2016), and in the Palearctic by 8 species (Ślipiński & Schuh 2008; Aoki 2011, 2018). Only one species, L. jelskii (Wankowicz, 1867), is known as a primeval forest relict in Eastern and Northern Europe, whereas the most diverse Palearctic fauna has been reported from Japan (4 species: L. akitai Aoki, 2018; L. niponius (Lewis, 1879); L. okadai Aoki, 2011; and L. sculpturatus (Sharp, 1885)). The fossil species described in the current paper confirms the presence of the genus in the Paleogene Western Palearctic. The single Recent European species is boreal and the locality in Puszcza Białowieska (Poland / Belarus), situated at about 52°30´N, is one of the southernmost known points of the group’s present-day distribution (Nikitsky & Slipinski 2003). Like the situation with fossil erotylid species from Rovno amber, Zavaljus lyubarskyi Alekseev et Bukejs, 2023 (Alekseev & Bukejs 2023), the southern limit of the present-day distribution range of the genus Lasconotus in Europe almost coincides with the late Eocene record at approximately 51° N. On the other hand, the modern boreal distribution of Lasconotus is evident only for Europe. Representatives of the genus inhabit different latitudes in North America from Canada to Mexico
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.049 | 0.022 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".