MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6968219211 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.16284801

Pluteus fuscipruinatus V. Keerthi & C. K. Pradeep 2024, sp.nov.

2024· article· en· W6968219211 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPileusContext (archaeology)BasidiumStipe (mycology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pluteus fuscipruinatus V. Keerthi & C.K. Pradeep, sp.nov. (Figs. 3–5) MycoBank: MB854542 Diagnosis:—This species is characterized by a brownish pruinose pileus and stipe, polymorphic cheilocystidia, small globose to subglobose basidiospores and a trichoderm type of pileipellis in contrast to a cutis type in most other species of the /ephebeus clade. Holotype:— India, Kerala State, Thiruvananthapuram district, Palode, JNTBGRI campus: 8.75°N, 77.02°E, elev. 150 m, 19 September 2023, Keerthi TBGT(M)19392! GenBank [ITS]: PP938400 Etymology:— fuscipruinatus, refers to the brown pruinose pileus of the new species Description:— Pileus 12−40 mm in diam., plano-convex to applanate with a small broad obtuse umbo or with a shallow depression; surface brownish orange to brown (6C3/6E4/6E5) with dark brown (6F6−6F4) disc, pruinose throughout when young, most densely at the disc, later on with less pruina, except at the disc which remains densely pruinose, striate near pileus margin, dry, non-hygrophanous; margin straight, entire to incised. Lamellae free, orange-white to dull red with age (5A2/6A2/6A3/7A2/7A4/7B2/8B3), up to 5 mm wide, crowded with lamellulae of different lengths; edge concolorous with the sides, entire. Stipe 20−48 × 1−5 mm, central, cylindric, curved, brittle in some, equal or tapering upwards from a slightly broad base, solid to hollow; surface white with dark brown (6E5/7E5/7F5/8F8) minute pruina throughout, dense at the extreme base, smooth to glabrous at the extreme apex. Pileus context up to 1.5 mm thick, white, thin, soft. Mycelial mat present at the extreme base. Odor none. Taste not recorded. Basidiospores 4.2–5.2 × 4.1–5.1 µm (avL= 4.84 ± 0.26 µm, avW=4.5 ± 0.22 µm); Q = 1.0–1.15, Qm= 1.07, globose to subglobose, hyaline, smooth, thick-walled. Basidia 14.7−27.7 × 6.3−8.6 µm, clavate to cylindro-clavate, 4-spored, smooth, thin-walled, hyaline. Lamella edge sterile with crowded cheilocystidia. Cheilocystidia 10.4–98.6 × 5.5–16.5 µm, polymorphic, broadly clavate, fusiform, utriform to lageniform with obtuse to subobtuse with a long narrow apex, thin-walled, hyaline. Pleurocystidia moderately abundant, 47.1–82.2 × 16.3–24.7 µm, fusiform, utriform to lageniform with obtuse apex, thin-walled, hyaline. Pileipellis a trichoderm composed of polymorphic elements, 85.8−93.7 × 14.0−39.9 µm, narrowly clavate, cylindro-clavate, lageniform to fusiform, thin-walled with brown intracellular contents. Stipitipellis a cutis composed of parallel hyphae, 3.6–23.2 µm wide, thin-walled, hyaline. Caulocystidia abundant, present throughout the surface of the stipe, 24.5−79.3 × 7.8−22.9 µm, polymorphic, clavate, cylindro-clavate to fusiform with round to subobtuse apex, thin-walled with brown intracellular contents. Clamp connections absent. Habitat and phenology:—Solitary to scattered on soil or dead decaying angiosperm twig. June−September. Additional specimens examined:— INDIA. Kerala State, Thiruvananthapuram district, Palode, JNTBGRI campus: 8.75°N, 77.02°E, elev. 150 m, 08 June 2023, Keerthi TBGT(M)19189; ibid., 19 June 2023, Keerthi TBGT(M)19219; ibid., 16 July 2023 Keerthi TBGT(M)19323; ibid., 14 September 2023, Keerthi TBGT(M)19385; ibid., 14 September 2023, Keerthi TBGT(M)19386; ibid., 19 September 2023, Keerthi TBGT(M)19393. Notes:—Phylogenetic analyses with nrITS sequence data (611 bp), place Pluteus fuscipruinatus in the ephebeus clade of Pluteus sect. Celluloderma. Two Pluteus sequences (KR002882; KR002899) from India exhibit 98 % sequence similarity with the current species. However, morphological details of the collections of these sequences are lacking, so they cannot be compared to our species. Molecularly, the closest (named) relatives of P. fuscipruinatus are P. hirtellus and P. squarrosus. Sequence comparison reveals 97 % sequence similarity with 14 nucleotide differences with P. hirtellus (MG968804) from Sáo Tomé. Morphologically, P. hirtellus differs by its slightly smaller, shaggy, fibrillose, grayish brown pileus (23–35 mm), smaller globose to subglobose basidiospores (4.5–6 × 4.2–5.5 µm), smaller clavate hymenial cystidia, epithelial pileipellis, and the absence of caulocystidia (Desjardin & Perry 2018). Pluteus squarrosus (NR169965) from China, differs at 15 nucleotide positions and morphologically by its comparatively smaller, brown, squarrose to verrucose, squamulose (18–35 mm) pileus, larger basidiospores (5.5–6.5 × 5–6 µm), smaller cheilocystidia (35–42 × 9–18 µm), clavate pleurocystidia, and smaller fusoid to lageniform caulocystidia (Hosen et al. 2019). Other species with notable morphological similarities particularly the dark brown pileus include the following species described from Sri Lanka: P. psichiophorus (Berk. & Broome) Sacc. (1887: 670), P. stigmatophorus (Berk. & Broome) Sacc. (1887: 674), P. brunneopictus (Berk. & Broome) Sacc. (1887: 669), P. albolineatus (Berk. & Broome) Sacc. (1887: 671), and P. fusconigricans (Berk. & Broome) Sacc. (1887: 673). Pluteus psichiophorus is distinguished by its diminutive (0.7–20 mm), fibrillose-squamulose, rimose pileus, glabrous stipe, larger ovoid basidiospores (6–8 × 5–6.5 µm), smaller hymenial cystidia, and a disrupted epithelial pileipellis (Pegler 1986). Pluteus stigmatophorus is characterized and distinct by its larger, squamulose, radially striate pileus, dark brown lamellar edges, clavate hymenial cystidia, and epithelial pileipellis intermixed with elongate dermatocystidia (Pegler 1986). Brownish, rimose, radially fibrillose-striate pileus, glabrous stipe, larger ovoid basidiospores (7–9 × 5–6 µm), smaller pyriform to ellipsoid cheilocystidia with brown contents, and smaller ellipso-pedicellate pleurocystidia (26–44 × 15–20 µm) distinguish P. brunneopictus (Pegler 1986).A cracked pileus, glabrous stipe, larger broadly ovoid basidiospores (5–6.5 × 4.5–5.5 µm), smaller inflated pyriform cheilocystidia, vesiculose to broadly cylindrical pleurocystidia, and a disrupted epithelial pileipellis separate P. albolineatus from the present taxon (Pegler 1986). Pluteus fusconigricans is distinguished by its smaller (10–25 mm), radially striate pileus, dotted brownish lamella edges, glabrous stipe, larger ovoid basidiospores (5.5–7 × 4.2–5.2 µm), smaller pigmented hymenial cystidia, and an epithelial pileipellis (Pegler 1986). Some of the Indian species in P. sect. Celluloderma, must be compared such as P. delicatulus C.K. Pradeep & K.B. Vrinda (2006: 95), P. brunneosquamulosus C.K. Pradeep & K.B. Vrinda (2012: 870), P. fuscopunctatus C.K. Pradeep & V. Keerthi (2023: 2), P. parvulus Keerthi, Ševčíková & C.K. Pradeep (2024: 115), and P. pauxillus Keerthi & C.K. Pradeep (2024: 120). The very small, thin, delicate, fragile basidiomata, small pileus (7–10 mm), globose basidiospores, smaller clavate hymenial cystidia, epithelial pileipellis, and absence of caulocystidia separate P. delicatulus from the new species (Pradeep & Vrinda 2006). Pluteus brunneosquamulosus is distinct by its smaller (8–26 mm), rimose pileus, larger subglobose to broadly ellipsoid basidiospores (4.5–7 × 4.5–6 µm), smaller lageniform hymenial cystidia, and hymeniderm pileipellis (Pradeep et al. 2012). Larger basidiomata (22–60 mm), large basidiospores (5.6–6.0 × 5.2–6.0 µm), large cheilocystidia (30.0–159.9 × 11.4–32.5 µm), and lageniform pleurocystidia characterize P. fuscopunctatus (Keerthi & Pradeep 2023). A small, depressed pileus (3.5–22 mm), globose to ellipsoid basidiospores, and smaller hymenial cystidia separate P. parvulus while P. pauxillus is distinct by its smaller (10–17 mm), shallow, depressed pileus, broadly ellipsoid to ellipsoid basidiospores, smaller hymenial cystidia, and a mixed epithelial type pileipellis (Keerthi et al. 2024).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions→French-language works237,207→