MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6968229335 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.13258599

Microcercis albipalpis von Tschirnhaus 2007

2024· article· en· W6968229335 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBryophyte Studies and Records
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTable (database)George (robot)South carolina

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microcercis albipalpis (Meigen, 1830) CANADA. ALBERTA. Banff, 1, 4 July, 12 Aug 1925, Owen Bryant (4m, 6♀; NMNH); Lethbridge Co.: Lethbridge, June 1967, N. L. H. Krauss (2♂: NMNH). BRITISH COLUMBIA. Fraser-Fort George: Prince George, 550−600m, Aug 1970, N. L. H. Krauss (2♀: NMNH); Thompson-Nicola: 8 mi. S Merritt, 19 Aug 1970, Oman (2♀; NMNH); Vancouver Is.: Courtenay, 0– 50♂, 1 July 1978, N. L. H. Krauss (1♀; NMNH); Courtenay, June 1965, N.L.H. Krauss (5♂, 1♀; NMNH). MANITOBA. Glenboro–South Cypress Municipality: Aweme, 2, 26 June, 1 Aug 1916, N. Criddle (7♂, 1♀, 1 missing abd.; NMNH); Treesbank, 2, 13 [swept from grass], 20, 23, 28 July, 15 Aug 1915, N. Criddle (25♂, 3♀; NMNH); St. Boniface: 200–300 m, 17 June 1971, N. L. H. Krauss (3♂, 1♀; NMNH). NEW BRUNSWICK. Westmoreland Co.: Shediac, 8 Aug 1967, N. L. H. Krauss (1♂; NMNH). ONTARIO. Waubamick, July 1915, H. S. Parish (1♀; NMNH). PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND. Souris, July 1967, N. L. H. Krauss (1♀; NMNH). SASKATCHEWAN. Saskatoon, 21 June 1937, A. R. Brooks (1♂; NMNH); Saskatoon, 14 July 1939, 17 July 1940, Kenneth M. King (2♂, 1♀; NMNH). YUKON TERRITORY. Whitehorse, 2000–2200 ft., July 1970, N. L. H. Krauss (1♀; NMNH).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.135
Threshold uncertainty score0.269

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicBryophyte Studies and RecordsFrench-language works237,207