MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6968236019 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.16583444

Resonant Order Collapse in Parkinson's Disease: A ROTE-Based Harmonic Analysis and Coherence Restoration Framework

2025· preprint· en· W6968236019 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsFields Institute for Research in Mathematical Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoherence (philosophical gambling strategy)Harmonic analysisHarmonicQuantum decoherenceSubstantia nigraPrincipal component analysisRobustness (evolution)Order (exchange)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study applies the Resonant Order Theory of Everything (ROTE) to Parkinson’s disease by analyzing transcriptomic coherence in laser-dissected dopaminergic neurons from the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc). Using harmonic indexing based on $\phi^n$ and prime resonance thresholds, we uncover a breakdown in gene expression synchrony specific to Parkinson’s pathology. Principal component analysis (PCA) and entropy-based clustering reveal that this phase decoherence aligns precisely with ROTE-predicted collapse zones. These findings suggest that Parkinson’s disease may originate from deterministic disruptions in harmonic coherence rather than stochastic degeneration. This work opens the door to targeted, non-pharmacological interventions using frequency-based therapies to restore resonant order.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies→French-language works237,207→