Bibliographic record
Abstract
222 Euura nuorbinjargi (Saarinen, 1949) Figs 241, 460 Amauronematus nuorbinjargi Saarinen, 1949: 55–62. Diagnosis Females can be identified based on the colour pattern. Median mesoscutal lobe and mesoscutellar appendage are at least partly black, the first tergite is usually completely black and subsequent tergites with sharply decreasing black area (if the first tergite is mostly pale, then subsequent tergites are completely pale). Males have similar colouration, but might not always be distinguishable from, for example, the males of E. rufa. Female 6.8–8.8 mm (Schmidt 1997). Pterostigma usually pale, brown or centrally paler than externally; hind femur extensively pale, usually only dorsally black; hind tibia black or anteriorly and posteriorly pale or brown; usually first tergite completely black and subsequent terga with black flecks decreasing in size, sometimes abdomen nearly completely pale; sterna, hypopygium, and valvifer 2 pale; cerci extensively pale at least basally; valvula 3 extensively pale or brown; valvula 3 asymmetrical in lateral view, ventrally more distinctly curved than dorsally. Male 5.5–7.0 mm (this study; Schmidt 1997). Pterostigma centrally paler than externally; hind femur and tibia usually extensively pale (only dorsally black), sometimes nearly completely black; first tergite completely black and subsequent terga with black transverse lines decreasing in size; all sterna pale. Type material examined Holotype Amauronematus nuorbinjargi FINLAND – Inari Lapland • ♀; Utsjoki, Nuorbinjarg; 69.60° N, 25.97° E; 23 Jun. 1947; A. Saarinen leg.; MZH, http://id.luomus.fi/GL.2588. Host plants Salix hastata L. Genetics COI Based on 8 specimens, maximum within-species distance is 0.61% and the nearest neighbours, diverging by a minimum of 0%, are Euura amicula, E. betulae, E. histrio, E. rufa, E. septentrionalis, E. striata, E. tenuis, and E. tota. Nuclear Based on 8 specimens, maximum within-species distance is 0.5% (0.43% based on haplotypes of individual females). The nearest neighbour, diverging by a minimum of 0.5%, is Euura histrio. Distribution and material examined Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Finland, and Sweden.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".