MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6968283977 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.13715914

Neidium vandusenense Hamilton, Savoie, Sayre, Skibbe, Zimmermann & Bull, 2019, sp. nov.

2019· article· en· W6968283977 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicDiatoms and Algae Research
Canadian institutionsSpinal Cord Injury BCCanadian Museum of Nature
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRapheRidgeApex (geometry)LineationClockwiseStriation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neidium vandusenense sp. nov. Figs 19–44 Individuals examined for morphological analyses: n = 61, examined for molecular analysis: n = 7. Valves linear to linear elliptic with apiculate extended apices (Figs 19–30). Valve length 96–116 μm, width 20.0– 23.0 μm. Striae oblique to mildly convergent at apices, 14–17 in 10 μm. Areolae round to elliptical, 14–16 in 10 μm. Voigt faults on secondary side of valve. Central area transapically expanded, covering 1/3 to 1/2 the valve width. Linear ghost striation markings present along edge of central area (Figs 21–22, 25, 27–28). Axial area linear-elliptical from mid-valve to apex. In LM, raphe filiform and linear-elliptical. Three or more longitudinal canals present along each margin. Central raphe ends deflected hooks, terminal ends forming bifurcate lacinia. Small terminal hyaline area present at apex (Fig. 20, arrow). In SEM external view, valves more or less linear with rounded margins (Figs 31, 33). Apices broadly protracted and mantle at apex recessed not forming linear sides (Figs 31, 33). Raphe linear with a broken thickened ridge along primary side and weak to no ridge along secondary side (Figs 32, 34). Proximal raphe ends form distinct small hooks in opposite directions on small central mound (Fig. 32). Distal raphe ends form broad triangular lacinia with curved expansion at mantle base (Figs 33, 35). Axial area with randomly positioned surface depressions (Figs 32, 34). Areolae depressions on external valve face with recessed finger-forming silicate cribra (Figs 34, 36). Three to four flat, longitudinal canals present along each margin (Figs 32, 36). Internal valve: Central area elevated with ghost striae (Fig. 37). Central helictoglossae offset with small silica interconnection. Terminal helictoglossae form vertically on terminal nodule (Figs 38, 39). Canals flat with valve face, all of equal size and form (Figs 40, 41); towards apex canals extends to hyaline terminal nodule at apex (Fig. 38). Areolae chambered with transapical interconnections (Fig. 41 arrow, on mantle). Areolae covered by hymenes (Figs 42, 43). Renilimbia (2–6) around areolae along axial area, and longitudinal canals (Fig. 42). Renilimbia also randomly scattered around areolae on the valve face. Copulae open bands, with 2 rows of pores (Figs 43, 44). Type:— CANADA. British Columbia: Vancouver, VanDusen Botanical Garden, J. Holmes, December 28, 2016. Small stream at the end of Livingstone Lake (pond) (holotype: CANA! 126257-7, fig. 22 holotype specimen, circled on slide). Isotype ANSP GC65327 (circled specimen on slide). Genbank #s See table 2. Etymology:—The specific epithet (vandusenense), is recognized for the collection site at the VanDusen Botanical Garden. Registration: http//phycobank.org/102030 Observations:—Plastid rbc L DNA sequence, size (96–116 μm), valve outline, 3–4 longitudinal canals, ghost striae along the margins of the central area and recessed mantle margins at the apices identify this taxon. Neidium vandusenense can be compared to N. siveri Metzeltin & Lange-Bertalot (2007: 179) with a similar valve outline, but N. vandusenense is distinguished by the larger size (64–74 μm long, N. siveri), more than one longitudinal canal and the weak oblique striation formation. Neidium vandusenense can also be compared to N. grande Gandhi (1959: 313, as N. grandis) with respect to general valve outline, protracted apices, and multiple longitudinal canals. N. vandusenense is differentiated from N. grande by larger size (45–55 μm, N. grande), linear to slightly triundulate valve margins (not elliptic), and stria density (26–28 in 10 μm, N. grande). No ghost striae were observed in N. grande. Another comparison can be made with N. capitellatum Gandhi (1959: 313, as N. capitellata) with respect to valve outline, although N. capitellatum is smaller (46–86 μm long) and the apices are capitate. In North America compare with N. affine var. humerus Reimer (Patrick & Reimer 1966: 392) with respect to similar valve outline and ghost striae along the central area. N. vandusenense is larger than N. affine var. humerus (41–78 μm long), the valve margins of N. vandusenense are more linear and sometimes weakly triundulate, the apices more protracted and 3 + longitudinal canals versus 1(2) in N. affine var. humerus. The stria and areolae densities of N. affine var. humerus are also higher.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicDiatoms and Algae ResearchFrench-language works237,207