Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dialineura gorodkovi Zaitzev Specimens examined (44). YT: Carcross; Carcross, Bennett Lake dunes; Kluane National Park, Bullion Creek dunes; Nisling River; Sekulmun Lake, N end; Sekulmun Lake, Isaac Creek; Takhini River dunes 6.8 km NNE Kusawa Lake outlet; Whitehorse, 5 km N. AK: Becharof National Wildlife Refuge; Gates of the Arctic National Park; Kobuk Valley National Park. RBCM, UAM. Database and literature records (93). YT: British Mountains; British Mountains, Firth River (Fig. 14); Carcross; Old Crow; Trout Lake. AK: Kobuk dunes, 145 km E Kotzebue; Nogahabara dunes, 105 km N Galena. CNCI, INHS, MEI, SEM, USNM. Conservation status. Yukon: S4S5 Distributional notes. A Holarctic therevid, D. gorodkovi ranges in the western boreal region in North America. It is unknown in British Columbia but widespread in the Yukon, where it is recorded from scattered localities in the southwest (Carcross, Kluane, Kusawa Lake, Whitehorse) and far north (British Mountains, Old Crow). In Alaska, it inhabits dune systems in the north (Killik River, Kobuk, Nogahabara) and occurs south to the Alaska Peninsula; it probably is widespread in sandy sites over much of the state. Ecoprovinces and other designations. YT: Boreal Cordillera, Taiga Cordillera. AK: Arctic Tundra, Beringia Boreal, Subarctic Tundra. Range. Palaearctic-East Beringian. Russia and China east to Alaska, Yukon, Northwest Territories, and northern Manitoba (Webb & Irwin 1991, Webb et al. 2013, Liu & Yang 2012). Biological notes. Flight period: 23 May–25 July. Dialineura gorodkovi is reported in grassland tundra (Fig. 14) and on sand dunes or blowouts near, or away from, water (Fig. 15). One dune site on the Takhini River, Yukon, was sparsely vegetated with Carex sabulosa, Polemonium sp., and Lupinus sp. (RBCM). Specimens were collected from under wood and rocks on a sandy lakeshore in Becharof National Wildlife Refuge, Alaska (UAM).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".