Physiomorphus rufolineatus Pollock 2000, sp. n.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Physiomorphus rufolineatus Pollock sp. n. (Figures 32, 49-50, 56, 69) HOLOTYPE,, ♂ labelled:`Nova Teutonia Santa Catarina Brasil, OCT. 1940 27°11'La.,52°23'Lo. / Fritz Plaumann Collector’, in AMNH. Allotype, ♀, with identical label data as holotype, in AMNH. Nine PARATYPES: one ♀, labelled:`BRAZIL: Santa Catarina, Nova Teutonia Dec. F. Plaumann’, in MCZC; one, ♂ with same label data as holotype, in AMNH; one ♀, labelled:`BRAZIL: Santa Catarina, Nova Teutonia Nov. F. Plaumann’, in ANIC; one ♀, labelled:`PARAGUAY X-9-1968 Pto. Presidente Stroessner / at light / Collectors: L and C. W. O’ Brien’, in DAPC; one ♀, labelled:`BRAZIL: Santa Catarina, Nova Teutonia Oct. F. Plaumann’, in MCZC; one ♀, labelled:`Nova Teutonia Santa Catarina Brasil, X-9-1944 27°11'La.,52°23'Lo. / Fritz Plaumann Collector’, in AMNH; one, ♂ labelled:`Nova Teutonia Santa Catarina Brasil, IX-30-1940 27°11'La.,52°23'lo. / Fritz Plaumann Collector’, in AMNH; one ♀, labelled:`Corupa (Hansa Humbolt) S. Cath., Brazil Oct. 1944 / A. Maller Coll., Frank Johnson Donor’, in AMNH; one ♀, labelled:`CAMBARA DO SUL, RS 25 / XI / 1993 E. H. Buckup leg. / Col. MCN 155024 ’, in MCNZ. Derivation of specific epithet This new species is named for the presence of a narrow, rufous sutural stripe along the otherwise piceous elytra. Diagnosis, adult This species may be separated from its congeners by the following diagnostic combination: frons with short, deep furrows along inner margins of eyes; elytra piceous with narrow, rufous sutural margin. Description, adult Characters of Physiomorphus, with the following specific features: Body moderately wide (TL/GEW 1.94-2.06), slightly ovate. Head moderately wide (GHW /HL 1.06-1.10); scape moderately long, slightly widened distally; antennomere 2 moniliform, more than half length of scape; antennomere 3 fi liform; antennomeres 4-10 moniliform, 7-10 slightly serrated; antennomere 11 narrowed distal of midlength, without distinct cleft; last maxillary palpomere expanded, slightly cultriform. Pronotum moderately transverse (GPW /PL 1.34-1.44), slightly to moderately wider than head (GPW /GHW 1.11-1.22); lateral margins of disc straight to slightly sinuate anteriorly to midlength; anteriorly, straight to slightly arcuate to anterior margin; discal depressions relatively small and deep, well-de fi ned; punctation dense and coarse, not umbilicate; setation sparse. Elytra moderately convex, with very slight suggestions of multiple, longitudinal costae; vestiture moderately long and dense, not obscuring coarse, dense punctation; apical binding patch slightly conspicuous dorsally. Abdomen. Sexual setae relatively short, reddish, directed posteriorly at about 30° angle; male genitalia with paramere with moderately deep sinuation near apex, beginning in distal third. Colour. Base of head, antennae and maxillary palpi piceous to black; frons rufous to rufopiceous; ventral mouthparts rufous; pronotum rufotestaceous with median infuscated region (absent in one specimen examined); elytral disc piceous with narrow sutural and lateral marginal lighter stripe, sutural stripe appearing almost white; legs piceous except base of tibiae lighter in some specimens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".