Tomopteris planktonis Apstein 1900
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tomopteris planktonis Apstein, 1900 (Figs 1, 14–15) Tomopteris planktonis Apstein, 1900: 42, Pl. XI, Figs. 21, 22 [original description, Atlantic, Labrador, Guinea and South Equatorial currents].– Rosa 1908: 301 [brief description and differences from other species].– Fauvel 1923: 224, Fig. 84 d [description, North Atlantic].– Caroli 1928: 513 [brief description, Messina], 1928(1930): 18 [distribution, Red Sea], 1933: 378–379 [description, Naples].– Stǿp-Bowitz 1948: 52 [brief description, Atlantic].– Fauvel 1953: 142, Fig. 71 [description, Indian Ocean].– Dales 1957: 663 [brief description, Pacific, Cape Disappointment, Oregon, south of San Francisco Bay, Monterey Bay].– Day 1967: 206, Fig. 8.2 n –o [brief description,Atlantic Ocean from Greenland to Antarctica, North and Mediterranean seas, South Atlantic off the coast of South Africa].– Ushakov 1972: 216 [distribution, North Pacific up to 45ºN].– Orensanz & Ramirez 1973: [distribution, Brazilian, Uruguayan and Argentine shelf].– Rozbaczylo et al. 1987: 107–198, Fig. 2e [description, South Pacific, Chilean coast], 2020: 167, Fig. 9 [description and distribution, South Pacific].– Kolbasova et al. 2023: 75, Figs 25–27 [description, Antarctic Ocean, South Atlantic, Brazil-Malvinas confluence, Bransfield Strait, Orkney Through, Orkney Plateau]. Tomopteris cavallii Dales 1957: 144, Figs. 51 b, 52 b [description, Pacific Ocean, Monterey Bay]. Material examined. Four specimens: ZMMU WS20991, ZMMU WS20992 (FA, Et), ZMMU WS22577, ZMMU WS22578 (Et) Description (based on all our material). Body oval, elongate, 5–10 mm long, 0.6–1 mm wide without parapodia, 2.5–4 mm wide with parapodia. Tail absent, posterior ends with short cylindrical pygidium, maximum width with parapodia 2.6 mm, maximum width of body trunk 0.9 mm (Fig. 15A). Live worms transparent, white in preservation. Eyes red. Brain transversely oval (Fig. 15B). Body with 14 pairs of parapodia increasing in size to 3 rd pair; 4–6 pairs longest; from 7 th pair, parapodia decrease toward posterior end. Prostomium with frontal cleft, prostomial horns slightly curved backward. Ciliated epaulettes triangular, extending to posterior margin of brain. Anterior cirri absent (Fig. 15B). Secondary cirri (streamers) 1–1.2 of body length. Dorsal and ventral parapodial rami of equal length (Fig. 15C–E). Pinnules oval, pinnal membranes do not adnate to parapodial trunk, membrane in dorsal ramus slightly lower than in ventral ramus. Hyaline glands apical, from 1 st pair of parapodia in ventral pinnules (Fig. 15C–E). Chromophile glands from 3 rd parapodial pair, in 3 rd pair of parapodia they incompact and poorly visible, from 4 th parapodial pair chromopile glands with 8–10 tubes, compact and large; base of ventral ramus terminates at proximal end of chromophile gland and not bordered by pinnule (Fig. 15C–E). Small yellow rosettes present from 1 st pair of parapodia, they are located in ventral pinnule between chromophile and hyaline glands (Fig. 15C–E). Gonads in dorsal rami (Fig. 15E). Distribution. Type locality: Labrador, Guinea, South Equatorial currents (Apstein 1900). Later records for T. planctonis include: Atlantic Ocean from Greenland to Antarctica, Mediterranean, Pacific; Central Red Sea (this study). Remarks. Both morphologically and according to 18S and 28S markers, T. planktonis from the Red Sea is similar to T. planktonis from the Weddell Sea. Applicability of the COI marker obtained with universal primers in holopelagic annelid families General topology of the tree inferred from nuclear 18S and 28S including all considered families is presented in Fig. 16A. It conforms to contemporary conception of relationships between holopelagic annelid families. However, including COI sequences in the analysis introduces some changes in the topology above genus level, although it does not affect the species-level results. Thus, in 18S + 28S + COI concatenated tree within the family Typhloscolecidae, the genus Typhloscolex becomes non-monophyletic with one lineage merged inside Travisiopsis (Fig. 16B). Tomopteridae are grouped with Glyceridae in the 28S + 18S tree (Fig. 16A). Conversely, when the COI is added to the analysis, the Tomopteridae clade becomes a sister group to Typhloscolecidae (Fig. 16B). Nothing changes only in Alciopini, which are nested within Phyllodocidae regardless of which set of markers was used (Fig. 16).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".