Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lasionycta phoca (Möschler) Figs 61, 62, 170, 226. Map 15 Dianthoecia phoca Möschler, 1864: 197. Scotogramma phoca; Smith 1893a: 129. Lasiestra phoca; Hampson, 1905: 47 Lasionycta phoca; Lafontaine et al. 1986: 264. Scotogramma albinuda Smith, 1903: 19, syn. n. Lasionycta albinuda; McDunnough 1938: 71. Type material. Lasiestra phoca: holotype [ZMHB, not examined]. Type locality: Labrador. Scotogramma albinuda: lectotype ♀ [AMNH, examined]. Type locality: Rama, Labrador. Th e female lectotype was designated by Todd (1982: 10). Diagnosis. Lasionycta phoca is a very dark species from subarctic northeastern North America. It is nearly uniform dark charcoal gray with black lines and spots. Lasionycta phoca is smaller than any other L. phoca sub-group species except L. mono (expanse <30 mm). Th e black ventral hindwing postmedial line is diffuse but prominent. It forms a smooth arc and touches or nearly touches the discal spot. Other species, including L. uniformis handfieldi that occurs on the Gaspé Peninsula, have a hindwing medial band that is thinner, undulating, and well separated from the spot. Th ese characters also differentiate L. phoca from L. anthracina, a smaller nearly black L. leucocycla sub-group species from boreal forest habitat in eastern North America. The male and female genitalia and male antenna of L. phoca are typical for the subgroup. Th e male corona is single except near the apex of the valve. The two CO1 sequences of L. phoca are most similar to that of L. u. uniformis, differing by at least 0.24 %. Distribution and biology. Lasionycta phoca occurs in eastern and central Canada with records from Labrador to the west coast of Hudson Bay. Adults fly over tundra, are diurnal and nocturnal, and come to light. It has been collected in June and July.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.039 | 0.012 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".