Bibliographic record
Abstract
Genus Calycomyza Hendel, 1931 Calycomyza Hendel, 1931: 65. TYPE SPECIES. — Agromyza artemisiae Kaltenback, 1856. A B C REMARKS Most species of Calycomyza are characterized externally by a yellow frons, dark antennae, yellow notopleuron, dark scutellum, pale yellowish halter and the presence of only two postsutural dc. However, exceptions exist, such as: C. meridiana (Hendel, 1923), a widespread neotropical species, with yellow third antennal segment; C. devia Spencer, 1973 from Venezuela and Costa Rica with a brownish frons and darker notopleural areas; C. compositana Spencer, 1973, C. illustris Spencer, 1973, C. steviae Spencer, 1973, C. parilis Spencer, 1973 and C. palmaris Spencer, 1973, all from Venezuela, have 3+ 1 dc. The latter two species also feature a brown halter. A distinctive characteristic of the genus is the male genitalia with the epandrium and surstyli having a patch of short strong spines. Seven specimens of Calycomyza were collected on the Mitaraka massif, representing four species (Boucher & Pollet 2021). Two of them were represented by females only (Boucher & Pollet 2021) and their identity could not yet be confirmed. These two species are characterized by the presence of 3+ 1 dc (two weaker anterior ones). Of the other two species, one represents C. grenadensis Zlobin, 1996 (morphospecies Calycomyza Mit-1 sensu Boucher & Pollet 2021), which was previously known from Grenada (Zlobin 1996a) (see below), and the other (morphospecies Calycomyza Mit-2 sensu Boucher & Pollet 2021) represents a new species, which is described below. Only one species, Calycomyza lantanae (Frick, 1956) was previously recorded from French Guiana (Anonymous 2018).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".