Bibliographic record
Abstract
Spilogona depressula (Zetterstedt, 1845) Aricia depressula Zetterstedt, 1845: 1460. Type-locality: “ Hab. in Svecia in primis boreali rarissime; in Helsingia ad Arbrå 24 Aug. [lectotype]; in alpe Mullfjellet Jemtlandiae 27 Jul. 1840 specimina duo legi. In Smolandia etiam mense Jul. ad Skärsjö a D. Ljungh bis captam vidi. In Scania ad Lund quoque semel deprehensa.” [SWEDEN]. Limnophora (Spilogona) reflecta Huckett, 1932: 316. Type-locality: “ 1♂, Bozeman, Montana, June 14, 1916; 1♂, June 15, 1916; 1♀, June 30, 1916. (Mont. Exp. Station)” [USA, Montana]. Syn. nov. Spilogona depressula (Zetterstedt, 1845); Sorokina, 2017: 53 (Yamalo-Nenez AO); Sorokina, 2018: 237 (Altai Krai, Altai Mts); Sorokina et al., 2018: 327 (Magadan region); Tridrikh & Sorokina, 2021: 827 (Magadan region). Notes. The series of Nearctic specimens of Spilogona reflecta (in Canadian National Collection) and the series of Palaearctic specimens of Spilogona depressula were examined. The descriptions of both species and the male terminalia are the same. I can therefore conclude that Limnophora (Spilogona) reflecta Huckett, 1932 is a new junior synonym of Aricia depressula Zetterstedt, 1845. Additional material examined. RUSSIA, Republic of Mordovia: 1♂ 1♀, Temnikov, bank of Moksha River, 54°37’33.2”N 43°11’57.8”E, 3.viii.2020, leg. K. Tomkovich (ZMUM). Novosibirsk area: 1 ♂, Novosibirsk, the arboretum, 30.v.2005, leg. V. Sorokina; 1♀, the same data, but 12.vii.2008. Magadan area: 1♀, ~ 100 km NNE Seimchan, Nature Reserve “Magadansky”, 63°39’N 153°16’E, larch forest, sweeping in grass, 4.vii.2019, leg. N. Tridrikh; 1♀, the same data, but in yellow pan trap, 10.vii.2019; 1♀, ~ 100 km NNE Seimchan, Nature Reserve “Magadansky”, 63°39’N 153°17’E, valley of Suksukan River, thickets of young willow, sweeping in grass, 13.vii.2019, leg. N. Tridrikh; 8♀♀, the same data, but 17.vii.2019; 1♀, the same data, but sweeping over river pebble, 24.vii.2019; 2♀♀, the same data, but on house window, 8.vii.2019 (SZMN, except where stated otherwise). Distribution. PALAEARCTIC: Austria, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Latvia, Norway, Poland, Russia (Europe, Siberia, Far East), Sweden. NEARCTIC: Alaska to NWT & Manitoba, Montana, Washington, California. DNA barcode. BOLD BIN: BOLD:AAL6514. See Table 1 for GenBank accession numbers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".