Bibliographic record
Abstract
148 Euura epilosa (Lindqvist, 1970) Figs 147–148 Pteronidea epilosa Lindqvist, 1970: 102–103. Diagnosis The colouration and the lancet of E. epilosa are most similar to those of E. nigricornis and E. miliaris, but its antenna is distinctly shorter. Type material examined Holotype Pteronidea epilosa RUSSIA – Irkutskaja oblast • ♀; Irkutsk, Oljhonsk, Popovo; 52.741° N, 106.309° E; 22 May 1967; B.N. Verzhutskii leg.; collected from Spiraea media; MZH, http://id.luomus.fi/GL.5142. Notes Recently discovered in Europe. A single female was collected in Bulgaria in 2022 by E. Heibo close to Spiraea sp. and several larvae on Spiraea media F.Schmidt in Slovakia by A. Lendel (Ladislav Roller, pers com.). Male unknown. The Euura epilosa group includes also E. brachycera (Lindqvist, 1975) (known from Irkutsk oblast and Primorsky Kray, Russia) and possibly Nematus mandshuricus Zhelochovtsev & Zinovjev, 1994 and Euura vastidens (Lindqvist, 1975). Euura epilosa, E. brachycera and N. mandshuricus have been reared from Spiraea, but E. vastidens from Dasiphora fruticosa. Host plants Spiraea media (Verzhutskii 1981). One generation per year. Genetics COI Based on 3 specimens, maximum within-species distance is 1.37% and the nearest neighbour, diverging by a minimum of 6.79%, is Euura brevivalvis. Nuclear Based on 2 specimens, maximum within-species distance is 0.73% (0.05% based on haplotypes of individual females). The nearest neighbour, diverging by a minimum of 3.45%, is Euura brachycera. Distribution and material examined Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Bulgaria, Russia, and Slovakia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".