MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6968386564 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.14812909

Ceratopera pilifera Karling 1986

2018· article· en· W6968386564 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal plant biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStyletIntertidal zoneAlgaeCrew

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CERATOPERA PILIFERA KARLING, 1986 (FIG. 4B, E, F) Ceratopera pilifera Karling, 1986: 212–214, figs 58, 65–67. New localities: Clover Point, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada (48°24 ′ 12 ″ N, 123°21 ′ 03 ″ W), algae in rocky lower intertidal (14/11/2016). Little Wolf Beach, Calvert Island, British Columbia, Canada (51°39 ′ 53 ″ N, 128°07 ′ 44 ″ W), algae in rocky lower intertidal (07/04/2016). Friday Harbor, San Juan Island, Washington, USA (48°32 ′ 42 ″ N, 123°00 ′ 44 ″ W), algae on the dock of the marine station (08/10/2016). Known distribution: Northeast Pacific Ocean: Oregon (Karling, 1986). Material: Observations on five live animals. Three whole mounts (BBM MI4046 – MI4048). 18S rRNA (G e n B a n k a c c e s s i o n # M F 3 2 1 7 4 9), 2 8S r R N A (GenBank accession # MF321759). Remarks: Animals are 0.7– 1 mm long and appear plumper and more Proxenetes- shaped than described by Karling (1986) (Fig. 4B). Internal organization typical for species of Ceratopera with paired lenticular eyes, rostral rhabdite tracks, a pharynx located mid-body, paired testes situated behind the pharynx, paired ovaries and vitellaria. Two large ovate seminal vesicles are connected to the rounded copulatory bulb. The stylet is 97–106 μ m long (x = 100 μ m, n = 3; non-axial: 52–57 μ m) and resembles the stylet of C. pilifera as described by Karling (1986). It consists of a curved stylet proper, measuring 74–80 μ m (x = 76 μ m, n = 3), with a 23- to 26- μ m-long (x = 24 μ m, n = 3) proximal base, and a curved, funnel-shaped, 46- to 47- μ m-long (x = 46 μ m, n = 3) accessory mantle piece (Fig. 4F). These measurements correspond to the ones from the Oregonian specimens. The hair-like eponymous protrusion of the accessory mantle piece could not be observed in our specimens. However, a thickened part of the convex edge of the mantle piece (arrow in Fig. 4F) corresponds to this structure. Moreover, the needle-like structure on the accessory piece in figure 67 in Karling (1986) could easily be interpreted as a thickened edge rather than a hair-like protrusion. The funnel-shaped and distally curled bursal appendage measures 78–88 μ m (x = 82 μ m; n = 3) and is typical for species of Ceratopera sensu Den Hartog. Distally it splits into two 29- to 32- μ m-long tubes (x = 31 μ m; n = 3). Based on the strong resemblance of the stylet and bursal appendage with those of C. pilifera, we attribute our specimens to this species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicMarine and coastal plant biology→French-language works237,207→