Bibliographic record
Abstract
Paragnetina immarginata (Say, 1823) Notes Paragnetina immarginata is commonly referred to as the Beautiful Stone (Stark et al. 2012). The distribution of this large and common species extends from Quebec and Maine south along the Appalachian Mountains to Tennessee and Georgia (Stark 2004, DeWalt et al. 2024). Little life history information exists for P. immarginata. Smith (1913) conducted a preliminary observational study of this species in New York over a three-month period in a tributary to Coy Glen (Tompkins County). Johnson (1981) reported dietary overlap between larvae of P. immarginata and A. capitata in Orwell Brook (Oswego County). Harper and Pilon (1970) found that this species exhibited an extended emergence period from early July to late August in Quebec. In New York, collections of adults range from mid-June through mid-September (Fig. 33) at elevations ranging from 50-658 m asl (Fig. 34) from larger streams and rivers across the state (Fig. 37 a).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".