MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6968471068 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15341393

ELEMENTI EKOLOŠKOG VASPITANJA I OBRAZOVANJA KOJI UTIČU NA RAZVOJ EKOLOŠKE SVIJESTI DJECE PREDŠKOLSKOG UZRASTA

2025· article· hr· W6968471068 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Languagehr
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Science and Water Management
Canadian institutionsCegep de Sept Iles
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrder (exchange)Work (physics)Phase (matter)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nauka, obrazovanje i praktična aktivnost utiču na formiranje ekološke svijesti današnjeg čovjeka. Najvažnijim faktorma koji utiču na ekološko vaspitanje i obrazovanje smatraju se porodica, okolina, predškolska ustanova, škola, vršnjaci, mediji i drugo. Neophodan nivo ekološke svijesti formira se edukacijom mladih od najranijeg uzrasta. U procesu vaspitanja i obrazovanja razvija se ekološka svijest kod djece i omladine, a škola je najvažniji faktor obrazovanja. Da bi se moglo pravilno odnositi prema životnoj sredini treba postaviti cilj ekološkog vaspitanja i obrazovanja, da sama ličnost dosegne ekološku vaspitanost neophodnu sredini. Znači, moramo pronaći što bolje nastavne planove i programe, udžbenike, edukovati predavače i nastavnike, sprovoditi vannastavne aktivnosti, odnosno, prilagoditi, poboljšati i unaprijediti cio ambijent škole u cilju razvoja ekološkog vaspitanja i ekološke svijesti od najranijeg uzrasta. Ključne riječi: ekološko obrazovanje, škola, vaspitanje, ekološka svijest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.736
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0040.008
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0760.052

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it