Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Monarda fistulosa Linnaeus, Species Plantarum 1: 22. 1753. "Habitat in Canada." RCN: 176. Lectotype (Reveal in Jarvis & al. in Taxon 50: 513. 2001): Herb. Clifford: 11, Monarda 1, sheet 5 (BM-000557572). Generitype of Monarda Linnaeus (vide Hitchcock, Prop. Brit. Bot.: 116. 1929). Current name: Monarda fistulosa L. (Lamiaceae). Note: Fernald (in Rhodora 3: 14. 1901) discussed Herb. Linn. 40.1 (LINN) in some detail but did not call it the type (in contrast to his comments on M. mollis L. on the same page). Epling (in J. Bot. 67: 3. 1929) noted material in LINN, as well as in Clifford’s herbarium, and treated one of the latter sheets as the "standard specimen" (not the same as the type). McClintock & Epling (in Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot. 20: 165. 1942) followed Epling, and Scora (in Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot. 41: 34. 1967) stated that the name was probably based on a garden plant in the Linnaean herbarium. Scora’s statement is insufficiently precise to be admitted as a typification, particularly as it is unclear which sheet (40.1 or 40.2, both annotated by Linnaeus) was intended. The collections are not part of a single gathering, so Art. 9.15 does not apply. Reveal’s type choice is therefore the earliest formal typification.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it