Bibliographic record
Abstract
Thereva nobilitata (Fabricius) Specimens examined (26). BC: Central Saanich, Island View Beach; Central Saanich, Mt. Newton; Central Saanich, Saanichton; Esquimalt, Saxe Point Park; Saanich, Prospect Lake; Sidney; Vancouver, Convention Centre; Victoria, Beaver Lake Road; Victoria, Lost Lake; Victoria, Beacon Hill Park; Victoria, Holland Point; Victoria, Ten Mile Point. PFC, RBCM, SEM. Database and literature records (11). BC: Cloverdale; New Westminster; Vancouver; Vancouver, Point Grey; Vancouver, University of BC. CNCI, KCH, MEI, TAMU, USNM. iNaturalist records (4).BC:Delta(iNat219882783), Lantzville(iNat 233342721); Richmond(iNat 214675887), Victoria (iNat 169319936). Conservation status. BC: SNA Distributional notes. Thereva nobilitata is the only alien therevid known in British Columbia. It was originally introduced to the Vancouver area from Europe, where it is common (Holston & Irwin 2005). It is also recorded from southern Vancouver Island. The first BC record we have seen is from New Westminster in 1969 (MEI). Ecoprovinces and other designations. BC: Georgia Depression. Range. Introduced. Palaearctic, where it is native. In North America, it is also known from Ontario and Washington State (iNaturalist). Biological notes. Flight period: 6 May–5 August. This introduced therevid is typical of urban and suburban habitats in extreme southwestern British Columbia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".