MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6968516360 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3788549

Enargia infumata

2010· article· en· W6968516360 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
Canadian institutionsCanadian Food Inspection Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsType localityStatement (logic)Type (biology)Life history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Enargia infumata (Grote, 1874) Figs 1–18, 55, 59, 64. Orthosia infumata Grote, 1874; 160. Cosmia punctirena Smith, 1900; 222, pl. 5, f. 6. Cosmia punctirena; Dod 1905. Enargia mephisto Franclemont, 1939; 115, f. 2, syn. n. Enargia infumata; Forbes 1954, in part Enargia mephisto; Rings et al. 1992, pl. XV f. 23. Handfield 1999, p. 92, f. 9551-1, 9551-2. Type material. Orthosia infumata: lectotype female, here designated. BMNH, examined. Type locality: “Chautauqua Co., N. Y.” Although Grote’s (1874) statement in the original description that “specimens received from Mr. Geo. Norman” suggests that E. infumata could have been based on several syntypes, only one wing expanse measurement is given, and the type locality is restricted to Chautauqua Co., NY. Norman’s material originates from Ontario (M. Honey, pers. comm.). Th e type material most likely was a single Chautauqua Co. specimen, although this is not beyond question. To ensure the stability of the name Orthosia infumata, the following female specimen is therefore designated as lectotype: “Grote Coll.”; “ U.S. America / [crossed out, undecipherable] Co. / Chautauqua / Co. / N.Y.”; “1938. / 265”; “Type” [round, red bordered label]; Orthosia / infumata / Type Grote” [BMNH]. Th e following label will be added: “ Orthosia / infumata Grote / Lectotype by / Schmidt, 2010”. Although the abdomen is missing, the specimen is otherwise in good condition, and shows the dusky grey-ochre forewing colour (probably reflected by the name infumata) with a poorly contrasting reniform and orbicular, less sinuate AM line, dull ochre hindwing, and smaller wing expanse compared to the species previously thought to be E. infumata and described here as E. fausta. Cosmia punctirena: lectotype male (designated by Todd 1982). USNM, photograph examined.Type locality: “Yellowstone Park, Wyoming.” Th e specimen illustrated by Smith (1900) is the lectotype designated by Todd (1982), and the relatively unicolourous, dark forewing, non-contrasting reniform and orbicular, and pronounced black spot in the reniform, show that E. punctirena is correctly attributed to the synonymy of E. infumata. Additional Barnes specimens collected in August in Yellowstone (CNC) are of the same provenance as the original types, although these are not paralectotypes, and are also E. infumata. Th e original description of E. punctirena was probably based on a mixed series of E. infumata and E. decolor, as E. decolor specimens in the CNC from Glenwood Springs, Colorado (Barnes, September) and E. decolor from Cartwright, MB (Heath, August) are of the same provenance as the original syntype series. Although this does not affect the synonymy of punctirena, the diagnosis of the taxon by Smith is inaccurate. Enargia mephisto: holotype male. CUIC, examined. Type locality: “Ithaca, New York.” see ‘Remarks’ below. Diagnosis. Enargia infumata is most similar to E. fausta. Overall, E. infumata has a paler ochre, less yellow look to it with less contrasting markings and greater variation in colour. Th e unicolorous smoky-grey forms are unique to E. infumata (it was this phenotype that formed the basis of Franclemont’s description of E. mephisto). Compared to E. fausta, E. infumata is slightly smaller, has slightly thicker, less sharply defined AM and PM lines (when these are visible at all), less sinuate PM line, a dull, pale ochre (vs. yellow-ochre) hindwing ground colour, and the reniform and orbicular are often concolourous with the forewing ground colour (not paler and contrasting), and with a discontinuous or absent outline (thin, crisp outline in E. fausta). Specimens of E. infumata from the Prairie Provinces average slightly larger and paler than eastern E. infumata, and therefore have a general appearance more like that of E. fausta. Internally, the valve length is shorter in E. infumata (2.6–2.9 mm from apex to clasper at dorsal margin, vs. 3.3–3.5 mm in E. fausta), the cornuti of the vesica are smaller overall (length of free apex less than 0.10 mm vs. greater than 0.11 mm in E. fausta), with a relatively much larger sclerotized plate of the right cornutus (length of plate 4–5 × greater than length of free apex of cornutus, compared to 2.0–2.5 × in E. fausta). Th e peniculum (tegumen lobes) are on average shorter and broader (Franclemont 1939; Forbes 1954), but there is much overlap in shape between the two species and this is not a reliable diagnostic trait. In the female, the corpus bursae differs in size and shape, being longer (5–6 × length of segment VIII vs. 3.5–4.0 × in E. fausta), and more narrow-elongate than E. fausta (Fig. 64). Figures Ι–Ι8. Enargia infumata adults. Ι–3 ♁, Kootenay Plains, AB, CAN 4–ΙΙ ♁, Edmunston, NB, CAN Ι2 ♁, Taber, AB, CAN Ι 3 ♀, Panguitch, UT, USA Ι4–Ι 5 ♀, Kootenay Plains, AB, CAN Ι6–Ι 8 ♀, Edmunston, NB, CAN. Redescription. Head – Antenna of male prismatic, segments as wide as long; antenna of female filiform and ciliate; scales of dorsal antenna, scape, vertex, and palpus unicolorous but co-varying with ground colour of wings, from pale ochre, yellow ochre, brownish grey, to dull rusty brown. Thorax – Vestiture of thorax, patagia and prothoracic collar unicolorous, but varying from pale ochre, yellow ochre, brownish grey, to dull rusty brown; legs dull ochre yellow with longer scales of corresponding colour on femur and tibia. Wings – Forewing length: eastern populations average slightly smaller at 16.4 mm (n = 6) versus 17.4 mm (n = 6) for western populations; females slightly larger overall at 17.5 mm (n = 3) for eastern and 18.4 mm (n = 3) for western Figures Ι9–34. Enargia adults. Ι9 E. fausta, holotype ♁, St.-Basile, NB, CAN 20 E. fausta, ♁, Edmunston, NB, CAN 2Ι E. fausta, ♁, Temiscouata Co., QC, CAN 22 E. fausta, ♁, Black Sturgeon L., ON, CAN 23 E. fausta, ♁, Edmunston, NB, CAN 24 E. fausta, ♁, Peers, AB, CAN 25 E. fausta, ♁, Edmunston, NB, CAN 26 E. fausta, ♁, Black Sturgeon L., ON, CAN 27 E. fausta, ♀ St.-Basile, NB, CAN 28–30 E. fausta, ♀, St.-Basile, NB, CAN 3Ι E. ? paleacea, Delta, BC, CAN 32 E. paleacea, ♁, Hungary 33 E. paleacea, ♀, Hungary 34 E. paleacea, ♁, Finland. specimens; forewing ground color varying from pale ochre, yellowish ochre, brownish grey to rusty brown; dark markings varying from charcoal grey to reddish brown, and highly contrasting to virtually absent; angle of antemedial line rounded and obtuse, about 130°–140°; postmedial line evenly rounded to slightly sinuate; medial band varying from thick and diffuse to obsolete, co-varying with dark terminal and sub- apical shading; pale subterminal line present in specimens with dark terminal shading (Fig. 12); reniform and orbicular usually concolorous with wing ground colour or only slightly paler, rarely contrastingly pale; border of reniform and orbicular weakly defined and usually interrupted, or absent altogether; base of reniform (towards anal margin) with dark grey spot of varying size, but spot nearly always darkest of forewing markings; claviform absent; fringe concolorous with ground colour; ventral forewing less variable than dorsum, ground colour pale yellowish ochre with postmedial line and reniform spot variously developed, more so in specimens with contrasting dorsal markings and antemedial line absent. Hindwing ground colour pale yellowish ochre with dark shading varying in extent and colour from grey to dull maroon; postmedial line and broader, diffuse subterminal band visible when dark markings developed, varying to entirely absent; medial line better defined ventrally, with ventral discal spot similarly dark (rarely visible dorsally). Abdomen – Vestiture mix of pale yellowish-ochre and darker scales of colour of those on forewing dark markings; males with terminal and lateral scale tufts, which are absent in females. Male genitalia – (Figs 55, 59). Uncus cylindrical, tapering to a small distal hook; tegumen with large peniculum, consisting of long, triangular subdorsal lobe, 0.3 × length of valve, and short, rounded lobe adjacent to uncus base; valve 2.6–2.9 mm long, 4 × as long as wide (measured at widest part), corona extending from apex along ventral margin over 1/2 length of valve; sacculus 0.5 × valve length; clasper spatulate, recurved, and directed caudally; aedeagus 7 × as long as wide, tube shaped, with field of 10–18 short, stout backward-directed spines at ventral margin of apex; ventral margin of apex rounded and slightly scoop-like; vesica small, simple, bulbous, 0.4 × length of aedeagus, with two stout cornuti positioned laterally and directed caudad; free apex of cornuti equally sized (0.082 –0.099 mm); distal opening of vesica extending dorsally from vesica as gradually tapering tube. Female genitalia – (Fig. 64). Ovipositor lobes bluntly triangular in lateral view, ventral margin slightly concave, covered in short hair-like setae; abdominal segment VIII 0.7 × as long as wide, anterior apophysis 1.5 × and posterior apophysis 2.3 × length of abdominal segment VIII; ductus bursae extremely short, 2 × length of ostium, appearing thicker and more rugose than corpus bursae; long, duct-like proximal two-thirds of corpus bursae (which initially appears to be ductus bursae) with only slight widening toward ovoid distal chamber; corpus

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.084

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.150 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomyFrench-language works237,207