Assessment of biomorphological and economically valuable traits of Iris ×hybrida hort. varieties of the collection of N.V. Tsitsin Main Botanical Garden of Russian Academy of Sciences for subsequent hybridization in the conditions of Central Russia
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Every year, new zoned varieties appear that meet the natural and climatic conditions of a particular region. Due to the fact that most varieties of irises are bred in countries with a warm climate, there is a need to create domestic varieties that are not inferior in decorative qualities to the latest varieties of foreign breeding. As part of the study, a comparative study of Iris ×hybrida hort varieties was conducted according to such traits as resistance to diseases and pests, abundance of flowering, pollen fertility, plant height, number of flowers on the peduncle, length and width of the flower. The Gold of Canada is used as a standard variety. According to the results of our study, the varieties with the highest breeding index reflecting the presence of all the studied characteristics were identified.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it