Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hippocampus erectus Perry, 1810 Common name: Lined seahorse Hippocampus erectus Perry, 1810: unnumbered p. 177, Pl. 45 (orig. descr.; American seas, coast adjacent to Mexico and West Indies; no type specimen); Lourie et al. 1999 (redescription; distribution); Woodall et al. 2009 (new distribution). Hippocampus hudsonius DeKay, 1842: 322, Pl 53, Fig. 171 (orig. descr.; Hudson River, New York; no type specimen). Hippocampus punctulatus Guichenot, 1853: 174, Pl. 5, Fig. 2 (orig. descr.; Cuba; syntypes MNHN 6092); Duméril, 1870: 40 (redescription of syntypes). Hippocampus guttulatus Günther, 1876: 202 (in part, Caribbean). Hippocampus villosus Günther, 1880: 8, Pl. 1, Fig. D (orig. descr.; off Bahia, Brazil; holotype BMNH 1879.5.14.464); Lourie et al.; 1999: 91; Kuiter, 2009: 82 (Valid as Hippocampus villosus Günther 1880). Diagnosis. (Proportions and meristic data of 85 specimens, 59–120 mm in height.) Rings 11 + 31–35; dorsal-fin rays 17–19 on 2 + 1 rings; anal-fin rays 4; pectoral-fin rays 14–18. HL/SnL 2.5–3.2. Coronet well-developed, CI 3–4; small to large spines or absent; on head, principally on sphenotic with single spine on each side of head; frontal with bifurcate or simple spine, very evident over each eye, and one central, horn-like spine at junction with coronet; spines on body and tail distributed regularly on rings. Coloration. In preservative without defined pattern, often with irregular, white dorsal stripes that extend laterally on body and tail, parallel to rings. Finer white lines that run down the neck laterally may cross the rings. In life color varied: beige, yellow, light orange, dark orange and reddish brown; dorsal fin pigmented between and on rays, showing sub-marginal dark band from first to last ray, with edges free of pigmentation (Figure 2A). Habitat. Shallow waters to 73 m in depth. Found on marine algae, mainly floating Sargassum sp., sponges and artificial substrates such as moorings, anchoring boats and pieces of fishing nets. FIGURE 1. Morphotypes identification by Canonical Discriminant Functions (Wilks’ Lambda, 1st canonical function = 0.028, p = 0.00; 2nd canonical function = 0.412, p = 0.00). Distribution. Americas, Western Atlantic: Canada (Nova Scotia), USA, Bermuda, Bahamas, Cuba, Haiti, Caribbean, Leeward Islands, Mexico, Guatemala, Belize, Panama, Colombia, Venezuela, Uruguay, Argentina and Brazil (Vari, 1982; Lourie et al., 1999; Piacentino, 2008; Boehm et al., 2013; present study). Europa, Eastern Atlantic: Portugal, Azores Archipelago (Woodal et al., 2009).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".