MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6968575815 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3793286

Carpophilus hemipterus

2008· article· en· W6968575815 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMollusks and Parasites Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Forest ServiceNatural Resources CanadaNova Scotia Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNova scotiaCline (biology)North eastDried fruitOverwinteringIntroduced species

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<i>Carpophilus hemipterus</i> (Linnaeus, 1758) <b>York Co.:</b> Charters Settlement, 45.8395°N, 66.7391°W, 29.VIII.2007, 8.IX.2007, R.P. Webster, mixed forest, in pile of corncobs and cornhusks (local corn), (8, RWC). In Canada this adventive species has been recorded from British Columbia east to Québec (McNamara 1991), and in the United States it is widely distributed from Washington and California east to Texas and Florida and north to Wisconsin and Maine; also in Alaska (Parsons 1943; Downie and Arnett 1996; Chandler 2001). Horn (1879) remarked that the species was “widely distributed over the region east of the Rocky Mountains.” The species was reported from Nova Scotia by Majka and Cline (2006) but only as an intercepted species found on imported corn (<i>Zea mays</i> L., Poaceae). This cosmopolitan species has been found on a vast assortment of fresh and dried fruits and stored products including dried fruits such as apples, apricots, bananas, figs, prunes and raisins; fresh fruits and vegetables such as apples, apricots, oranges, dates, grapefruits, limes, maize, melons, pineapples, pears, peaches, persimmons, plums, and tomatoes; on grape skins, sugar, honey, grain, bread, biscuits, rice, avocado seeds, cotton seeds, shelled peanuts, corn meal, sorghum, cloves, and other spices (Hinton 1945).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.471
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicMollusks and Parasites StudiesFrench-language works237,207