MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6968593086 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3790702

Gyrinus gehringi Chamberlain 1929

2009· article· en· W6968593086 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaNova Scotia Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNova scotiaOgdenGlacial periodWrightNew england

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gyrinus gehringi Chamberlain, 1929 NEW BRUNSWICK: Westmorland Co.: Moncton, 24.IX.1977, M. Desrosier (1, UMNB); Moncton, 27.IX.1977, M. Roy (1, UMNB). NOVA SCOTIA: Cumberland Co.: Amherst, 22.IV.1995, J. Ogden (1, NSNR); Chignecto, 26.V.1993, E. Georgeson (1, NSNR); Halifax Co.: Second Lake, Chain Lakes, 21.V.1947, D.A. Livingston (2, NSMC); Lake Egmont, 30.IV.1990, 4.IX.1990, B. Wright (14, NSMC): Sackville, 20.V.1952, D.C. Ferguson (1, NSMC); Hants Co.: Lily Lake, 14.VII.1947, D.A. Livingston & J. Lewin (1, NSMC); Inverness Co.: Margaree Forks, 29.VIII.1991, E. Georgeson (1, NSNR); Kings Co.: Whitelock, 19.VII.1948, K.D. Archibald (1, NSMC). Gyrinus gehringi is newly recorded in New Brunswick and Nova Scotia (Fig. 9). Robert (1955) indicated that it preferred eutrophic habitats and Morrissette (1979) reported it from glacial lakes. The distribution map for this species in Oygur and Wolfe (1991, 66) appears to indicate a location in northeastern New Brunswick, however, neither Oygur and Wolfe (1991) nor Roughley (1991) report it from that province.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.091
Threshold uncertainty score0.180

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicAquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior→French-language works237,207→