Typhlodromus (Typhlodromus) pyri Scheuten 1857
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Typhlodromus (Typhlodromus) pyri Scheuten, 1857 Typhlodromus pyri Scheuten, 1857: 104. Typhlodromus (Typhlodromus) pyri.— Papadoulis et al., 2009: 141. Material examined. Netherlands: one female (HAL 100B198) from Rosmarinus officinalis (Lamiaceae), 3 Nov 2011. Previous records. Africa: Egypt (El-Badry 1967). Asia: Azerbaijan (Abbasova 1970), Saudi Arabia (Fouly & Al-Rehiayani 2011), Turkey (Çobanoðlu 1991). Europe: Austria (El-Borolossy 1989), Belarus (Sidlyarevich 1966), Belgium (Chant et al. 1974), Croatia (Tixier et al. 2010), Czech Republic (Hluchy et al. 1991), Denmark (Chant et al. 1974), England (Chant 1959), Finland (Tuovinen 1993), France (Rambier 1974), Germany (Scheuten 1857), Greece (Swirski & Ragusa 1977), Hungary (Kropczynska & Jenser 1968), Italy (Castagnoli & Liguori 1986), Moldova (Wainstein 1973), Montenegro (Mijuskovic & Tomasevic 1975), Netherlands (Van de Vrie 1963), Norway (Edland 1987), Poland (Wiackowski & Suski 1963), Portugal (Carmona 1962), Russia (Meshkov 1999), Serbia (Kropczynska & Petanović 1987), Slovakia (Jedlickova & Kolodochka 1994), Slovenia (Bohinc & Trdan 2013), Spain (Pérez Otero & Mansilla Vázquez 1997), Sweden (Chant et al. 1974), Switzerland (Ragusa & Swirski 1976), Ukraine (Kolodochka 1974). North America: Canada (Putman & Herne 1966), USA (Chant 1959). Oceania: Australia (Schicha 1987), New Zealand (Collyer 1964a). South America: Chile (Ragusa & Vargas 2002). Remarks. The species is distributed worldwide, but only one specimens from the Netherlands has been found. EPPO (2020) listed this species as a commercially used biological control agent. The species is considered as lifestyle Type III-a, generalist predator that lives on pubescent leaves, and also has the ability to feed on fungi (McMurtry et al. 2013).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".