Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lasionycta macleani (McDunnough) Figs 94, 234. Map 20 Anarta macleani McDunnough, 1927: 207. Lasiestra macleani; McDunnough 1938: 72. Lasionycta macleani; Lafontaine et al. 1986: 265. Type material. Holotype ♀ [CNC, examined]. Type locality: Mt. McLean, British Columbia. Diagnosis. Lasionycta macleani is known only from the female holotype from southwest British Columbia. It has a yellow-brown forewing with dark antemedial, medial, and postmedial lines and a round orbicular spot containing a dark ocellus. The dorsal hindwing is pale buff with a chevron-shaped discal spot and sharply demarcated marginal band. The ventral surface of the fore- and hindwing is luteous off-white with a large black arrowhead-shaped discal spot and thin marginal band on each wing. The appendix bursae is relatively thin, resembling those of the L. leucocycla species-group. The male is unknown. Lasionycta macleani is most similar to L. pulverea from Alberta but has a thicker ventral hindwing discal spot. The bursa, particularly the appendix, of L. pulverea is larger and more bulbous than that of L. macleani. Distribution and biology. Lasionycta macleani is known only from Mt. McLean where it was collected on July 11 with L. luteola, most likely during daytime at or above timberline on the east or southeast slope. Attempts by Jim Troubridge and the senior author to find it on the more accessible west side of Mt. McLean were unsuccessful.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".