MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6968633306 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3790252

Lasionycta mutilata

2009· article· en· W6968633306 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal plant biology
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAedeagusApex (geometry)HolotypeAntenna (radio)Ovoid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lasionycta mutilata species-group The L. mutilata species-group contains two similar species from the mountains and coast of northwestern North America. It is characterized by the combination of a dorsoventrally flattened uncus, an S-shaped valve with a 50° lateral bend at the base of the digitus, a large triangular cucullus with a long narrow neck, and a long rod-like digitus. The right side of distal aedeagus bears a raised area with multiple small spines. The vesica is 1.5× as long as the aedeagus and is widest mesially, extends to the right beyond a subbasal bend to end to the right of the aedeagus, and bears 3–6 basal cornuti with sharp central spines arising from a conical base and a distal band of multiple spines oriented perpendicular to the vesica. Th e male antenna is weakly biserrate with diamond-shaped segments, 1.5× as wide as the shaft. The female genitalia of L. mutilata (Smith) are similar to those of the L. subdita species-group but the posterior ductus bursae is slightly expanded leftward, probably to accommodate the raised area of the aedeagus, while the anterior part lacks an asymmetrical widening. Th e distal appendix bursae is broadly rounded.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicMarine and coastal plant biology→French-language works237,207→