Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vostox brunneipennis (Audinet-Serville, 1838) Psalidophora brunneipennis Audinet-Serville, 1838 [1839]: 30. TYPE SPECIMEN. — United States, male, MNHN [not examined]. MATERIAL EXAMINED. — 26 specimens French Guiana • 1 ♂; Arataye (affl. Approuagues); aval de Saut Pa- raré; 14.VII.1988; P. Grandcolas & L. Desutter leg.; MNHN • 2 ♂; Matoury (La Désirée); 20.VII.2014; SEAG com.; coll. CGIR • 2♀; same locality; 26.VII.2014; SEAG com.; coll. CGIR • 1♀; Matoury (Mont Grand-Matoury); 3.VIII.2014; SEAG com.; coll. CGIR • 1 ♂; same locality; 14.IX.2014; SEAG com.; coll. CGIR • 1 ♂; Saint-Elie (Savane roche sur le Haut Koursibo); 4°18’58”; 53°17’10”; 2.XI.2013; SEAG com.; coll. CGIR • 1 adult; Saül, sentier Belvédère (point de vue); 30.XII.2010; SEAG com.; coll. CGIR • 1 adult; same locality; 30.III.2011; SEAG com.; coll. CGIR • 2 adults; Montsinéry-Tonnégrande; Montagne des Chevaux (Montagne Yéyé), RN2 PK22; 100 m a.s.l.; 4°44’34.3”N, 52°25’53.51”W; 22.VIII.2010; SEAG com.; coll. CGIR • 1 adult, 1 ♀; same locality; 29.VIII.2010; SEAG com.; coll. CGIR • 2 adults; same local- ity; 7.XI.2010; SEAG com.; coll. CGIR • 1 adult; same locality; 29.V.2011; SEAG com.; coll. CGIR • 1 ♀; same locality; 29.VI.2013; SEAG com.; coll. CGIR • 1 ♂; same locality; 24.VIII.2013; SEAG com.; coll. CGIR • 1 ♂; same locality; 14.XII.2013; SEAG com.; coll. CGIR • 1 ♀; same locality; 4.I.2014; SEAG com.; coll. CGIR • 1 ♀; same locality; 11.I.2014; SEAG com.; coll. CGIR • 2 ♂; same locality; 19.VII.2014; SEAG com.; coll. CGIR • 1 ♀; same locality; 18.X.2014; SEAG com.; coll. CGIR • 1 ♂; same locality; 8.XI.2014; SEAG com.; coll. CGIR • 1 ♀; Régina; Regina, Saut Mapaou; 4°11’28”N, 52°18’54”W; 27.X.2014; SEAG com.; coll. CGIR. DISTRIBUTION. — Canada, United States, Central America, Colombia, Venezuela, Trinidad, Surinam, French Guiana, Peru, Bolivia, Paraguay, Brazil and Argentina (Brindle 1971c; Steinmann 1989b). REMARK Widely distributed in French Guiana. Steinmann (1989b) synonymizes Vostox brunneipennis and Vostox punctipennis (Stal, 1860), without justification, while Brindle (1971c) separates the two species on the account of the puncturation of the forewings. We here follow Steinmann, but in case the two species proved distinct, the species from South America should be named Vostox punctipennis (Stal, 1858).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".