MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6968638532 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15218417

Empis (Enoplempis) subgeneatis Sinclair, Brooks & Cumming, 2025, sp. nov.

2025· article· en· W6968638532 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicIchthyology and Marine Biology
Canadian institutionsCanadian Food Inspection Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypeSetaDorsumWingFemur

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Empis (Enoplempis) subgeneatis sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: BF8CC15F-C0A9-450A-81E1-5713DED3EA09 (Figs 187, 192) Type material. HOLOTYPE ♂, labelled: “Alsea [44°22′N 123°35′W]/ Ore. 4-26-29”; J.E. Davis / Coll.”; “ Empis / (Pogoenempis)/ geneatis/ Melander/ det. WJ Turner 1978”; “ HOLOTYPE / Empis (Enoplempis) / subgeneatis Sinclair,/ Brooks & Cumming [red label]” [dissected] (OSAC). PARATYPE: USA. Oregon: Washington County: Banks [45°36′N 123°06′W], 20.v.1964, Blk. light trap, K. Goeden (ODAC). Possible additional material (unassociated females). USA. Oregon: Benton County: Corvalis, Lewisburg Saddle ck below Old Growth Tr., 44.6423°N 123.2891°W, MT, 29.iii–23.iv.2013, SJF (1♀, CNC); same data except, 44°38′32.28″N 123°17′20.76″W, MT over ck, 23.iv–6.v.2013 (1♀, CNC); Marys Peak, 12 mi. W Corvallis, 3800 ft, 10.vi.1984, Darling (1♀, ROM). Diagnosis. This species is very similar to E. (En.) geneatis, distinguished by its larger size (wing length more than 6 mm), dense dorsal setae on the male hind femur, length more than twice femur width, and the male cercus is more rounded dorsally. Description. Wing length 6.2–6.5 mm. Male. Similar to E. (En.) geneatis, except as follows: head with ocellar triangle with several pairs of posterior setulae. Scape 5× longer than pedicel. Scutum without pair of greyish vittae. Postpronotum with numerous short, silky setae. Notopleuron clothed in long silky setae; 1 long pal and short silky setulae. Scutellum with pair of long sctl, with numerous pairs of long silky marginal setae. Fore femur clothed in long, wavy setae, longer dorsally and posteriorly. Fore tibia with long posterodorsal setae, 3× longer than width of tibia; ventrally with fine, dense setae, subequal to width of segment. Hind tibia evenly expanded apically, not broader than femur distally. Terminalia (Fig. 187): cercus broader than epandrium, suboval, rounded dorsally. Female. Not confirmed. Geographical distribution and seasonal occurrence (Fig. 192). Empis (En.) subgeneatis sp. nov. is known from Oregon. Adults have been collected in April and May and also possibly March and June. Etymology. The species name is in reference to the similarity of this species with E. geneatis. Nuptial gift presentation. Form unknown.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicIchthyology and Marine Biology→French-language works237,207→