Macropsis dalhousiensis Viraktamath & Yeshwanth 2021, sp. nov.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Macropsis dalhousiensis sp. nov. Figs 1 C–D, 3L, 5A–I, 7G. Probably green in life, preserved specimen ochraceous without dark marking on head and thorax. Spot on apex of clavus, series of spots on outer margin of forewing, dark fuscous. Head obtusely angled medially. Crown short medially than next to eyes, not raised above level of pronotum. Face convex in profile, rugose, including eyes broader than long. Clypellus constricted in distal 0.66, then expanded with rounded anterior margin, exceeding genal curve. Pronotum convex in profile, about half as long as wide medially, slightly shorter than mesonotum, narrower than head including eyes, rugae obliquely angular, converging on median line, posterior margin slightly concave. Forewing 2.7–2.8 × as long as wide. Basal tergal apodemes of abdomen broad at base, narrowed distally with apices conically rounded (Fig. 7G); sternal (2S) apodemes longer than broad at base, apices more or less truncate (Fig. 7G). Male genitalia. Pygofer dorsal margin angularly expanded medially with round posterior margin; ventral process not extending beyond dorsal margin and apically narrowed and black tipped. Style extended to apex of subgenital plates, upturned near apex and slightly narrowed before rounded and dark pigmented apex. Aedeagus with dorsal apodeme slightly longer than preatrium, shaft broad at base narrowed distally, curved dorsally in basal 0.33, gonopore on ventral margin with apical lateral flanges. Dorsal connective more or less U-shaped with slightly diverging dorsal arms. Measurements. Male 4.4–4.5 mm long, 1.3–1.4 mm wide across eyes and 1.4–1.5 mm wide across posterolateral angles of pronotum. Material examined. HOLOTYPE ³, INDIA: Himachal Pradesh: Dalhousie, 19.viii.1986, N. Shenmar (UASB). PARATYPE 1 male, data as for holotype (UASB). Etymology. The species is named after the type locality. Remarks. M. dalhousiensis sp. nov. externally resembles M. ganeshai and M. vagdeviae. It differs from M. ganeshai in the aedeagal shaft being narrowed apically compared to slightly broadened in lateral view beyond the dorsal curvature in the latter; from M. vagdeviae it differs in having much longer pygofer ventral process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".